Here's an interesting point of view on the "stolen" dvd player and why she went back to OG's house to give him the remote
VPlanet. I think you should watch Lisa's whole testimony so that you can get a better understanding of what she meant. She was pretty clear during cross.
LOL.... a real life judge on HLN just referenced the movie Chicago and said that what the defense in the Arias case was doing is trying to "razzle dazzle 'em" (in other words, just throwing out any dang thing to try and distract the jury). Interestingly, a couple posters, including me, said exactly that hundreds of pages ago on the original thread.![]()
Were you crying when you were stabbing him? --SuperJuan Martinez
Nobody believes a word out of your mouth. Why do you keep talking? -- ABC Interviewer to JA
I won't reply to VP and hope to not receive a response from him/her. You are right to question the assertion. Lisa (Andrews) wrapped up her testimony by emphatically stating that her impression of Travis's overtly sexual advances was based more on her inexperience than on his actions.
"Of all the emotions, the most dangerous emotion is love." P.D James
"Do you not realize, my son, with how little wisdom this world is run?" Baron von Oxenstiema"
RE: Mormon version of a player: Would a mormon version of a player send overtly sexual emails, grab a woman's butt in public, aggressively try and make-out with a woman he was newly dating? By new, I mean less than a year. How long did he date Lisa? If a man who I just started dating or dated for a few months did all of the above, I would find that completely inappropriate. RE: Naive viewpoint: I disagree. If she thought it was "overly-aggressive" then, it was. She is entitled to her feelings. They are valid.
VPlanet. I think you should watch Lisa's whole testimony so that you can get a better understanding of what she meant. She was pretty clear during cross.
She makes it clear that Travis made her feel uncomfortable and that is all that matters, no? It doesn't matter if she was sexually inexperienced or not. The fact is...Travis overstepped a boundary. He must have known she was virgin. Who would act that way with a virgin who is also part of the Mormon faith. Where was his sensitivity?
Remember, Mimi also rejected him as well....
This overtly sexual behavior doesn't make Travis a bad person, it just makes it clear he didn't have certain boundaries with women that he was smart enough to have.
Last edited by Peace Corpse; 04-01-2013 at 06:59 PM.
You guys, please either use the REPLY WITH QUOTE button or, if you can't use that from your phone, use the html quote and /quote in brackets around the post you are quoting. Just makes everything easier to read.
Did Deanna Reid/Reed not have any relevant info for defense or prosecution? She was with TA for 6 years. Could she possibly be called as a rebuttal witness?
Seems to me that Lisa admitted to being a bit of the aggressor in their make-out sessions. I think she was uncomfortable because he got a hard-on while they were making out and she took saw that as a problem that he should have been able to control. I'll watch it again (my third time) and see if I get anything else out of it.
She addressed the 'hard-on' issue directly in response to a question from Martinez. At this stage, as a witness for the defense and a woman who had borne a child since she separated from Travis Alexander, Lisa recognized that the 'boner' was a normal biological response from a healthy male in specific circumstances. It was not a marker of Travis's character. God would agree. Even as Mormons comprehend him.
![]()
Last edited by Ian 1; 04-01-2013 at 08:29 PM.
"Of all the emotions, the most dangerous emotion is love." P.D James
"Do you not realize, my son, with how little wisdom this world is run?" Baron von Oxenstiema"
If someone doesn't say they are uncomfortable how are they supposed to tell? Mind reading? She said she told him and he STOPPED
Defense was busy today
3/31/2013 OBJ - Objection/Opposition. - Party (001) 4/1/2013
NOTE: DEDEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO ELICITING TESTIMONY OR MAKING ARGUMENT RELATED TO AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES FOR WHICH PROBABLE CAUSE HAS NOT BEEN FOUND
Wonder if they're worried about what Alyce might say on cross since they opened the door to the stalking issue?
I think you may be right because I haven't seen or heard anything from her since the trial started except her saying she has Napoleon now. They dated for 6 years, he proposed to her, left her his beloved dog in his will-they were still close after the break up too. I was just thinking to myself the other day where has Deanna been hiding?
"Of all the emotions, the most dangerous emotion is love." P.D James
"Do you not realize, my son, with how little wisdom this world is run?" Baron von Oxenstiema"
The dense is objecting to any attempt by JM to elicit any testimony or admit any evidence relating to heinousness or depravity which were not allowed in the aggravating circumstances in seeking the death penalty, as ruled on by a previous Judge. They are worried about Alyce on cross.
There are currently 325 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 325 guests)