Right, none of the thousands of people on this site comprehend that except you.Originally Posted by VioletPlanet
Glad we cleared that up.
Right, none of the thousands of people on this site comprehend that except you.
Glad we cleared that up.
Thank you. :)
Good Lord!!! Seriously!!!!!Again!!!
LOL.... you made tea squirt out my nose from laughing
So levity is too much for you, but fashion commentary is not?? Interesting.
(And to enlighten you, the pic is of Elsa Lancaster who starred in the film The Bride of Frankenstein, it is not a pic of me. But how interesting that the moment someone has an opinion different than yours, you attack them personally with comments about what you believe is their personal appearance.)Riiiiiiight.....
That is why you referred to it as MY hairstyle?!?!
And any film history major would not be referencing Bride of Frankenstein (1935) and Young Frankenstein (1974) in the same sentence. Bride of Frankenstein was the sequel to Frankenstein (1931). There is NO WAY a film history major would make such an error. Just sayin'
Lighten up Elsa .... Show a little "levity". Your Maker, Dr. Frankenstein says: I've been cursed for delving into the mysteries of life! Maybe Franky needed a bit more humor? No?Right, none of the thousands of people on this site comprehend that except you.
Glad we cleared that up.
Did anyone notice yesterday the Dr. was explaining something and compared the brain to a computer....JA did the same thing during her testimony and also alot of the words she used when testifying i.e., fog, memory gaps, etc are the same words the Dr. uses. It also made me laugh yesterday when she was attempting to act like she was "out of it"..blank look and staring off into space like she wasn't mentally there....trying to act out what the Dr. was describing and then as soon as the jury left the room she was back to her old self, smiling with Nurmi...she absolutely sickens me!!!
Yes, the change in her demeanor from when the jury was present to when the jury was absent was very telling. It is SO obvious she is faking her alleged PTSD.
This is going back to that thing I was talking about the other day in re: to ppl coming off as snotty, No? Now ya'll cut this shit out and quit being so damn catty. I'm not trying to boss ppl either, but it is extreeeemly annoying.
[*Originally Posted by*royals02*Did anyone notice yesterday the Dr. was explaining something and compared the brain to a computer....JA did the same thing during her testimony and also alot of the words she used when testifying i.e., fog, memory gaps, etc are the same words the Dr. uses. It also made me laugh yesterday when she was attempting to act like she was "out of it"..blank look and staring off into space like she wasn't mentally there....trying to act out what the Dr. was describing and then as soon as the jury left the room she was back to her old self, smiling with Nurmi...she absolutely sickens me!!!.]
JA had plenty of time to familiarize herself with his work before she took the stand.
Your ignorance is Hilarious. One was horror, one was parody. Both are legend. Now Jodi, please cease your combative ramblings and let's get back to the point of this forum: it's called Death. In this case, Death by murder....or should I say slaughter. You want to continue this useless off-topic banter then spare the forum and message me privately. Who knows, I might be able to give you some useful hair tips.Riiiiiiight.....
That is why you referred to it as MY hairstyle?!?!
And any film history major would not be referencing Bride of Frankenstein (1935) and Young Frankenstein (1974) in the same sentence. Bride of Frankenstein was the sequel to Frankenstein (1931). There is NO WAY a film history major would make such an error. Just sayin'
Both of you just shut up already
Lol exactly. I am done . Sorry to all members....
Great observation. He said he met with her a dozen times... I'm sure she picked up some tips. She likes to study.
Dr. Drew's "juror" Katie said that when Dr. Dick was over at the defense table. He gave Jodi a big smile, and she smiled back at him. It didn't sit well with her. Smiling = lack of affect? This guy is full of shit.
I don't know how accurate Katie's reporting is but she said the jury wasn't even paying attention to any of the testimony.
I just hope that JM can shred this guy.
Thank u for your kindness. I do agree to a point. The lies and defense of those lies in a supposed Justice System is really getting to me. TGIF. Sorry to all. Have a great weekend all.
And most importantly ....so sorry for your loss. Thank u for your honesty and openness .
Wow, a Yes/No test, how scientific! Not.
Really? All she would have had to do with a test like that was answer a bunch of questions with "yes", and bam, "you've got PTSD!" Ugh.
"Well, it's YOUR fog..." - J. Martinez
She's so full of crap. The jury has got to see right through this.
And Arias is no dummy. Beating a test like this as a very intelligent sociopath was like taking candy from a baby. No doubt.
I wonder if the friends that discovered his body have PTSD.
God, that other site-what a bunch of idiots. They think someone else was involved because Jodi isn't strong enough to slice his throat. Also they think that the picture of Travis lying in the shower does not mean anything because it's not certain that he's actually dead, so the pic means nothing.
Last edited by snowfallsoon; 03-15-2013 at 05:40 AM.
Well in my opinion, they can bring in a thousand experts and not one of them can justify what JA did to Travis...just to think what the last moments of his life were like and what must have been going thru his mind makes me so sad and angry at the same time. I just don't understand how someone can butcher a person they supposedly loved...I hate watching her in that courtroom smiling like nothing is wrong or getting snarky with JM like she in in the right...its almost beyond comprehension
Exactly.
I admit I was a little harsh on the doctor yesterday. I've given this some thought and wanted to share a few things.
The doctor seems educated and knowledgeable. No denying that. He also seems likable, if a little bit arrogant at times. He may very well be an expert on PTSD.
My problem is that I do not believe for a millisecond that Jody has ever had PTSD. It is certainly not the cause of her memory problems and her convenient fog. For this doctor to say that she does makes me think he is doing it just for the money. I've got a serious problem with that.
On a completely nonrelevant point:
I agree that he looks like a Searcy but for some reason he reminds me of one of Snow White's dwarfs. Ironically it is the dwarf "Doc" that he reminds me most of. It's also funny that their exert witness on domestic violence believes that Snow White was an abused woman.Things that make you go hmmmmm. I've cracked this case wide open!
"You are entitled to your own opinions, but you are not entitled to your own facts." D. Moynihan
See my profile page for the location of my "Dear Diary" posts in the Jodi thread. http://mydeathspace.com/vb/member.php?82091-Justice11
Well obviously. It's not like a person facing life in prison or the death penalty would lie or anything. That's the ridiculous thing about all of this. She was traumatized and repressed the memories, yet she just spent 18 days on the stand, including talking about the crime scene and things that happened after. Jodi's "PTSD", much like her fog, is mighty convenient. PTSD that comes and goes when it's beneficial to her defense? Talk about making a mockery of real PTSD sufferers.
Well, I've had a close call or two --one on icy roads, one where a tractor trailer wasn't paying attention, changed lanes and ran me off the road. Surprisingly, I can remember that in vivid detail, including the emotions I had at the time, and that happened 3 years ago.OMG hahahahahaha
Fight or flight
hippocamus shut down, can't make any memories
so everyone on the jury that ever was in a near car accident as he used for HIS examples, or a car accident, shouldn't remember anything.
Okay jurors, no more telling stories about how you were almost driven off the freeway, near crashes or your car accidents. Wipe them from your brain, your hippocampus needs to shut down even if you are a rat or snake.
I was thinking that too. For someone who has been working with Jodi for 3 years, and who knew he was going to be on the stand after she was done, he was completely ill-prepared. I can understand if someone is uncomfortable with public speaking and therefore has to refer to notes; I would have to. But, to not even have a basic idea?
Yep. It's her excuse as to why she allegedly can't remember the stabbing part of the killing, or disposing of the murder weapons, or anything like that. Blanket excuse, so that she can't be pinned down by Martinez; but he's already done that, and so, damage done. This psychologist is pointless, imo.Welcome!
I think he implied it was because of her killing Travis. That the murder was the traumatic event that cased the stress. I don't know that he ever came right out and said that though. I was in a bit of a fog.
I think it will be worth watching for sure. Does anyone know the expected start time?
Funny thing is, I was half-watching one of the talk shows last night -- can't remember which -- and they were showing Jodi answering a juror question. And the question was something like "were you 'in the fog' when you were making out with Ryan Burns?" She answered yes. So, not only did this fog/PTSD occur in the middle of the murder, but it followed her into the car, on various stops for food and gas, and directly to Ryan Burns' house.
I don't buy the fog, or PTSD, at all. But, even if I did, no way would I believe that she could disassociate and then just be DRIVING around in this fog. Driving -- much of the way in the dark -- on an unfamiliar route to Utah, and being in a fog? No way.
Now, mind you, I can believe that a person can murder someone then go on about their day. History is full of these types of psychopaths. But, it's not that they go into a fog, it's that they just have no humanity and no conscience and they don't care what they did to another person. Jodi killed Travis, but she has no remorse or guilt because she believes it's his own fault. He dumped her and wouldn't give her the life she thought she was owed, so, he brought it all on himself. Thus, no guilt on Jodi.
Exactly. That's what I was thinking when I was watching this guy; he was contradicting himself all over the place. You can't claim a person is suffering from trauma when you're also claiming that they completely pushed the memories of the trauma out of their mind. It's one or the other. If you can't remember it (allegedly), you can't feel trauma and emotions over it.
"Well, it's YOUR fog..." - J. Martinez
[QUOTING VIOLETPLANET: And Arias is no dummy. Beating a test like this as a very intelligent sociopath was like taking candy from a baby. No doubt.]
I gotta respectfully disagree. Sociopath yes, but intelligent sociopath not even close. Just like her mediocre art, singing, etc. She is mediocre, and that might be giving her more credit than what she us due. She has made some many really stupid mistakes for an intelligent sociopath. A dog can mimic appropriate responses to what it is supposed to do.
Corrections: * is and *so..damn auto correct
There are currently 35 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 35 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
