I hope so too!Originally Posted by Harlette
i wonder why they would do this?? why not put the press on jodi's side, there should be a lot of room
i feel so bad for them, their lives on hold like this, they can't go thru the grievance process in order to start healing - and they have been in a holding pattern for 4 years - when all this is over it will hit them like a ton of bricksi hope they make it thru
are there an real friends or family on that site??? seems like no one there never even met him??That's exactly how I found this page too! I joined the FB page right around that same # of members. It grew fast- too fast where there were a lot of people there that were asking basic questions without doing their own research first and it started getting really frustrating. I saw a post referencing MDS so I looked it up and loved what I was reading. I think I even mentioned it in my initial post--- everybody here is educated and up to date on the case so the conversations flow well.
i agree, he is there to get justice for travis, no matter what, and i am sure travis' family approvesI appreciate you responding respectfully.I could be mistaken, but based on your comments I have the impression that you think I am not in support of and don't care about Travis, his legacy or his family. Please let me be clear, I am fully in support of all of these things. My comment was in regards to what Martinez and the court of law are responsible for.
It is a slippery slope when we start saying that a victim's legacy and overall character should be considered in a murder trial. By all means, it is more tragic to our sensibilities when a "good" person is murdered. If that person has a family, led a good life, contributed to society, etc. we may feel that it is more tragic than if a bum on the side of the road who never contributed to anything or anyone is murdered.
(I put children and similarly dependent victims in an entirely different category altogether, emotionally speaking. These are victims that are pure and innocent, in that you cannot possible put them in a "good" or "bad" category to begin with. But, that is easily an entirely different discussion. Ultimately, we should seek to put all victims in this same category. But we are human and tend to want to place children and other dependent victims higher.)
The Jodi supporters are trying to put a "value," if you will, on Travis' life. They are trying to bring down the reputation of Travis in order to diminish the crime that was committed against him. If we engage with them in regards to Travis' "goodness" we are allowing the crime of murder to be diluted with things that are not relevant.
The same theory can be applied to the murderer. It is a common defense strategy to try to make the defendant out to be better than the victim. However, if a person is a "really great person" does not give them more of a right to take a life than a "jerk of a person."
My point is that ultimately it does not matter if Jodi is a witchy whore or a virginal sweetheart. The same as it does not matter if Travis was a jerky womanizer or a devout virginal mormon. What matters is if Jodi willingly and with forethought took the life of Travis in cold blood.
I believe that is what the prosecution must prove. If we place a higher burden on them, such as preserving a legacy, then we are saying that the "goodness" of a person plays a factor in whether or not they are deserving of being murdered.
I've said many times that I will not debate if Travis is a sinner or a saint. The above is the reason that I feel that way. I realize it is late and I am extremely sleepy. I hope this all makes sense to me in the morning. Please feel free to disregard all of this and have an entirely different opinion. I just wanted to state how I feel about it.
What would you call the Jodi-themed porno spoof? You know someone is going to make one.
"Prepaid Anal"
"The KY Killer"
"Virgin Mormon Buttwhores Gone Psycho"
"Fill My Crater Lake"
"Underwater Chastity"
"Blowing Arizona"
"Freaky in Yreka"
OHHHH!!! LOL. Oops...Chauncy got me too. I've never seen that before. I thought is was pretty funny. My favorite part was the top comment on the YouTube video, it said something like, "jokes on you. i actually love this song"
When I used to read it, I saw a comment once from Tanisha's husband, and Daryl's (old guy) sister.
The State vs Jodi Arias ~ Travis Alexander murder trial
We've had numerous requests from people wishing to make donations to Travis' family [to cover travel and living expenses during the trial].
I am happy to announce that a PayPal acct is being set up but in the meantime, you can donate here:
ABA/Routing# 322272925
Account# 2032485-8
Credit to the Account of: Travis Alexander Memorial Fund or Samantha Alexander
Pacific Marine Credit Union
1278 Rocky Point Drive Oceanside, CA 92056
[Please be advised that neither of the admins manage this nor the PayPal acct. It is handled exclusively by Travis' family.]
I won't feel sorry for me, I'm getting drunk
But I'd much rather be somewhere with you
LOL... I got duped too. Wasn't Chauncy accused of being a troll?Chauncy got me too. I've never seen that before. I thought is was pretty funny. My favorite part was the top comment on the YouTube video, it said something like, "jokes on you. i actually love this song"
I know there are some but I believe they are more active on the memorial site.
Nah, not a troll. Just sort of popping in to be funny I think. Not like a real troll does to cause trouble.
The chit chat on the phone sex recording after her fake orgasm -----> OMG this is the one moment in this trial when I actually felt weirdly bad for her, just for a sec. The sex part was just stupid sounding, like something teenagers would make. But this last part of the tape is seriously cringe-worthy, hearing him lose interest as she grabs more desperately to keep his attention. Repeating the Fergie thing is the worst OMG...just stop!
This part stood out to me, thought I'd share:
Travis: "I'm actually not a big fan of Spiderman." [Just the underwear.]
Jodi: "Yeah, I like the storyline but I don't like sitting through all the movie. (giggly voice) Remember when you made fun of me when I was crying, when his best friend died? I was mad that you made fun of me 'cuz I got into the actual story. I was like 'he's so insensitive' (giggles)"
Travis: "It's like....Spiderman though. Ehhhh." [He says it like "yuck, Spiderman." ]
Jodi: "I know, but I didn't see it as bad. I saw it as a, like a love story and a story between...like what, what really jerked me was the way they had become friends, they were best friends that were enemies that, that finally they understood why they hated each other so there was no reason for it anymore? But then he died (giggly voice) so they didn't get to enjoy the fruit of that (pause) discovery which would have been the mending of their (pause) friendship. (laughs awkwardly) Anyway."
Travis: "Yeah."
Jodi: "(super awkward laugh) Ok, go on." [Telling him this Spiderman story make her pause and get all awkward about herself. She doesn't act that way when she tells the other stupid stories on this part of the tape. Curious.]
Travis: "Yeah, I don't like the Spidermans, I don't like the Supermans...." [Just the underwear, then. But of course. Seems legit.]
Hypothesis: she included the Spiderman underwear in her pedophile fairytale* because she knew that he wasn't into Spiderman. It's one of many smoothly-disguised, post-murder "fuck you's" to Travis.
* No, I don't believe any of this part of the defense. Not until someone else corroborates her testimony. I just think he was lusty and curious. And not knowing about KY? Come on. If she introduced him to THAT, then she probably got him started on MOST of the stuff they did because he clearly didn't know about some very basic things. Every horny teenager knows what KY is, for crying out loud.
That page was set up by Daniel Freeman; It was weird that he was called as a defense witness.
she just likes to have a little fun
I've only seen Darryl's sister commenting. Other than that, none. Although they did say that his sisters monitor it. Don't get me wrong- it's a very informative and supportive page- I think admin do a very good job at keeping everyone up-to-date on the latest developments, but it's all the comments/conversations posted that pushed me away from being active on it.
I saw that too! He created the page then removed himself for awhile. He recently came back to the page. (once it became private) I haven't seen him post anything on it though. I would think he'd be too scared to
plus it is obvious he has the hots for jodi and still visits her in jail all the time
This is what Tanisha posted today about what to wear in support of Travis
Tanisha Sorenson We have all been wearing blue ribbons, it was his second favorite color, so i would just keep wearing blue ribbons like we do, si jury dont get confused. We wear blue ribbons every day:) thanks everyone for support.
I know a lot of people didn't like him, but I felt he was really trying to be honest and impartial. His sister, not so much. :/plus it is obvious he has the hots for jodi and still visits her in jail all the time
she just likes to have a little fun
Got it... thanksshe has a cute avatar btw
What am I missing witht his link? I keep getting that Never Gonna Give you Up Song and it is not even 5 minutes long?
Chauncy duped you too
FFB, yes, that is what it is. Chauncy was just being funny and I was just helping it along a little.Just a little silliness! ;)Chauncy got me too. I've never seen that before. I thought is was pretty funny. My favorite part was the top comment on the YouTube video, it said something like, "jokes on you. i actually love this song"
you've been Chauncyed
Couldn't agree with you more! I was bored.
She disgusts me.
you've been Chauncyed
There are currently 43 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 43 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
