Ahh I hit post too soon on my phone. I meant I wonder when that text was sent. She claims he gave her the underwear on Valentines day. So if it was after that then maybe that's why she already has them when talking about the school girl outfit. If it was before then that's definitely fishy.
Yes, you're right. She did take pictures of the spidey stuff. If I'm not mistaken, she took them a few days after he was murdered.
She started building a case against him around the end of May. I personally believe she made that sex call to blackmail him. IMO, that was the start of all this.
"Were you crying when you were stabbing him? How about when you cut his throat, were you crying then?"
"The difference between a Stumbling Block and Stepping Stone is the Character of the individual walking the path"
I agree. She told him he recorded it, surely that was the catalyst for that "worst thing to happen to me" message from him.
Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if there was a little scripting on her part. "Oh, say (potentially inflammatory/ambiguous statement about 12 y/o girls) because that would be HOT, etc. etc.
I couldn't tell, is there any part of the conversation (when he picks up, when they hang up, or in the middle) that she did NOT record? Maybe to give him a few suggestions?
Honestly I think he said the 12 year old girl comment out of his own volition. She might have instigated the phone sex but anything he said was his own words. I don't think she ever planned this to be used in the trial because she really didn't think she would be caught. The tape was definitely her way of having power over him. I think its obvious he doesn't know he's being recorded because I don't think he would have wanted that side of him documented like that. And I also find it strange that he apparently wanted the phone sex recorded to listen to again but she recorded the whole conversion even the non sexual parts. What would be the point of that. If he truly wanted something to jack off to later then why wouldn't she just hit record after all the small talk stuff.
Also thanks berm for all the effort!
The court appearance over the computer porn that happened yesterday
Jodi is in court wearing her stripes and her ugly f'ing hair
Maria Shaffer will be testifying first (she is Jodi's ex attorney)
Her counsel of Jodi ended in Aug 09. On June 19, 2009 Maria and her co counsel went to Mesa PD to view the evidence. She was supposed to meet with Flores and Juan at 2. Maria had her investigator with her. They waiting in the lobby of Mesa PD and taken to a room to view the evidence. Flores brought in the evidence. Maria said they looked at cell phones. She says Flores had the phones plugged in and Juan was in attendance. Maria says Juan was looking through the files of the computer (Travis' computer)
Maria says Juan said "he's never seen so many selfies. Juan was looking for porn on the computer. Maria's investigator left the room first. When Maria left, the computers were still on.
Juan starts questioning Maria. Items were requested by Maria to be put in the viewing room. Juan says the request to power up the computer was by you correct? Maria says that's not how she remembers it
Juan says Maria and her investigator said it wasn't a good idea to start up computers but she did anyway- Maria says No
Juan says Maria and her co counsel made the selfie comment. Maria denies. Maria is denying requesting she wanted the cell phones fired up she says Juan wanted it fired up. Juan says then why were you there looking at evidence if you didn't want anything turned on? Maria says she had a property list but wanted to see how big the files were. Juan says so looking at the outside of an item can tell you this?
Juan- So to look at contents of a computer you have to fire it up! Yes or No- Maria Yes
Maria says Juan authorized Flores to turn on computers.
Juan- The state provided you the courtesy of turning on this computer...Yes or No....Maria Yes.
Juan done
Palin- Who controls the evidence at PD
Maria- The Prosecutor controls the evidence. Maria says prosecutors and defense have an ethical duty to protect evidence especially in a case like this. Maria says if she knew evidence would be destroyed she would have never let Juan turn it on. She was told a mirror image had already been done. Maria says Juan was only one who touched files.
Brian Neumeister is up next. (OMG) Remember he was the dude that was the eyeball expert.
Brian can bring deleted things back. Brian says never turns on a computer ever and use a write blocker first. If turned on without pulling drive first everything is compromised. Brian says the computer was turned on twice and shut down without a write blocker. June 10th, 9:27am- quite a few files were gone through and modified
Brian says the first thing the computer did was ping Southwest Airlines, downloaded updates for windows and Itunes. Looks like computer was on for 45 minutes. Brain says he is still in the process of reviewing this computer. Any key evidence that was in memory is now gone forever possibly due to this action of turning on and off without a write blocker. Palin points out this is a violation of procedures and Brian says "Oh Yes it is"
6/19/2009 2:58pm the computer was turned on again without a write blocker. 2500 files were modified, accessed or deleted. There's 1000's of fingerprints on the computer that doesn't belong to Travis. Testimony from state said no virus's during the first trial. Brian says he has pages and pages of virus's on the computer. Tons of porn links. Brian says based on testimony from the trial no virus's or porn was supposed to be on the computer, but it was loaded with both. There were 19 privacy scrubbers on the computer. The virus links to porn, but some porn was manually searched.
June 1st, 2008 porn was manually searched and Expert say's it's graphic. They read some off "great body, great sex"
Dec 2007, escort sites and movies were loaded on computer
Lunch
Brian went to view the computer and was told there was a 24 hour notice and he had to come back. Mesa PD followed that protocol. 70,000 files were scrubbed and it wasn't a program installed on the computer
Expert can't tell when this was done or who did it
Sites that were manually typed in are "good anal", "perfect BJ"
Spybot doesn't block someone from looking at porn
Brian- I printed at least 90 pages then stopped because what's the point? Brian says there were 6,000 hits on Teen Porn. Expert says some files were too vile to pull up. Lot's of teen porn, slut was in there a lot. On all the cell phones (3 of them) from Mesa PD, all the sims cards were missing. external hard drive was tampered with and missing the operating system according to Brian. Brian says he's surprised this wasn't found 6 years ago in regards to porn and virus'.
Brian says the porn on the computer isn't the elephant in the room it's the aircraft carrier in the room
Juan's up
Juan is noting Brian didn't find any porn on Travis' hard drive. Brian states Dorkin may not have been provided correct info to examine. There is no way he could have missed it says Brian.
Juan is talking about Sims card and how the expert doesn't know if the Mesa PD may have got the phones minus the Sims card
Juan- So maybe the defendant was involved in some kind of shenanigans with the cell phones.
Juan asks expert do you know how video camera was damaged? Expert NO. But you are making it sound suspicious.
Juan- You are making this sound like police misconduct, but you didn't review the police report. Just because you can't power up the external hard drive it doesn't mean there's misconduct by police
Juan- So the Compaq computer isn't a Dell is it?
Brian-"you are trying to skirt around the fact there's porn on the computer Juan" Any competent expert would find this.
Juan- "So you are saying Lonnie is incompetent"
Brian -"Or you were trying to keep it from evidence"
Expert- You don't understand computers Juan can I explain...
Juan..NO (HAHAHA)
Juan says he will present evidence that Brian broke the hard drive
Bryan says "that's just slimy Juan"
Judge calls for a break.
All attorneys head for the judge's chambers.
Juan is saying the judge is going to order him (Brian) to turn over clones he examined and software he used. This hearing will conclude on 12/4. (Here comes the clone identified as "Tony." They grabbed the wrong image and sent to Martinez. They then sent a correct one. "Tony" is a tech)
Juan wants the clones that Brian worked with turned over. Juan has one but not another. Juan wants raw data from Brian. Brian says he's slammed and will have info handed over by Wed
Court is finished!
I guess you're forgetting about the phone recording of him getting off talking about a 12 year old, the pictures he took documenting his anal adventures, his computer full of porn, and all the sexual relationships in violation of his Mormon vows & bishophood (including with married women). On the day he died, he buttfucked a woman he had recently called "the most solid form of evil" and "the lowest of low you are sick and evil".
Not a perv though, right?
No, I don't mean scripted as in he knew he was being recorded. I don't think he had any idea at all that she would record it, at least not so that she could play it for the people closest to him. He learned she was going to do that, and that was part of what led him to call her the worst thing that ever happened to him. It was blackmail. But phone sex, sometimes one person kind of tells the other what they'd like to hear them say. Not for recording, but just because it turns them on.
It's certainly possible he said the 12 y/o girl thing of his own volition. I dunno. The whole thing is quite fucked.
I'm not saying the recording was intended for use in court. I don't even think she had planned to kill him at that point. I agree with you 100% that it was a means of trying to control him by threatening his image in the eyes of his friends, family, and church.
+1 .... Berm is the best!
"Before you embark on a journey of revenge, dig two graves" .. Confucius
"The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation " ...... Henry David Thoreau
Well, I think at one point- She started building a case by hiding, covering up, making and editing the evidence. Not exactly for murder, but def for some kind of scheme she came up with to "get back" at him. There's a very good reason Jodi's computer was ruined and her diary is full of lies.
I actually agree with you. I def don't think Travis was a saint. He's a man and he had a computer. Porn is probably a sure bet.
I just can't think of anything he did that justifies being stabbed dozens of times, throat cut, and shot.
If I had to guess, she was going to have some other guy help her put the audio recordings and pictures on the internet so all the Mormons and Prepaid Legal people could see the real Travis. Or maybe hack his blog and post all the stuff on there.
That would give her some revenge against Travis and also validate her hidden relationship with him. Now everyone would know just how special Jodi was to Travis.
My point is that I do not believe she was building a justification for murder. She did want to use his own private words and deeds against him in public, just not in this way. She might have intended to threaten to go public unless he took her back and married her, or perhaps forgave her debt for the BMW.
I wasn't specifically saying it to you.... more to myself. We all know there's no reason for murder- I just like to understand the events that leads somebody to do such a thing and why they feel like that's their only option.
I like the theory you have about the possibility of a scheme Jodi had to release all Travis' stuff. That could be why it seems like she likes to lead him to talk about some of the PPL guys John Dixon, Abe, etc.. because she wants to get it on tape. It probably wouldn't look good for that to be released. Maybe she planned on ruining him with PPL and the church.
I'm reading twitter for the trial and Juan displayed a text from JA that talks about spanking and pounding. Dr F responded by saying this type of texting is typical for people in relationships, not uncommon, but it was wrong for TA.
That's just messed up. Those texts didn't prompt TA to stab, shoot and slit the throat of TA. If those texts were unhealthy for anyone, it was JA.
The sexpert said it.
Talking about grinding & facials & BJ's. She also said 'sexuous' yesterday (verified by the trial reporter) among many, many other things. This Dr. F woman is just SO GOOD.@TrialDiariesJ
Hahah.... Fonseca says there is reference to jizzles in these convos #jodiarias
1:55 PM 24 Nov 14
Last edited by *crickets*; 11-26-2014 at 03:31 AM.
She thought she was studying for a degree in English Literature/Literary Criticism, but she couldn't make the grade so they gave her one in Psychology instead.
"Of all the emotions, the most dangerous emotion is love." P.D James
"Do you not realize, my son, with how little wisdom this world is run?" Baron von Oxenstiema"
Sexpert likes to jizzles (Part 1)
11/24/14
The judge wants to see attorneys before they start court. Nurmi has a problem with the photos that are being taken of Jodi. He's blubbering about a bunch of nonsense. The judge denied the motion. Let's move on.
The judge wants the jury to write down their concerns and put it in the box since this trial will probably go into Jan.
The sexpert if still up.
Juan starts off and wants to know if she viewed photos on the internet regarding this case? Yes.
Juan wants to see all the stuff she looked at on the internet- Nurmi objects- and the sexpert says "If you wanted to see them, you should go look for yourself"
The sexpert refuses to answer with a yes or no. She starts to complain to the judge.
Juan asks her if she has memory problems. She won't answer. They continue to battle back and forth with words. He even brings up previous research she's done, plus mentions an assessment tool she made and she refuses to answer yes or no. The sexpert tells Juan to "stand back a little" and Jodi is smiling at this point.
Juan brings up the photoshoot text (the one where Travis wants to tie Jodi to a tree)Text was May 2nd, 9:13am and from Travis. 3 minutes later there's another one. 3 minutes later another one. Juan points out a piece of the text that says "muse" Juan asks if that means it's an email. IM between Travis and Jodi...Jodi says "You've been a fantastic outlet for my musings"
Sexpert says she doesn't know if this word "musing" suggests male or female.
Juan says- are you suggesting Travis is a transgender?
Now they are battling with "words" again. Juan brings up the penis picture. The sexpert doesn't know where it came from. Juan says "you don't even know who's penis is was?" and the sexpert says "correct"
Nurmi wants a sidebar stat.
Juan wants to know when she found out whose penis it was? When Jodi was on the stand.
Sexpert- I don't remember. Jodi was on the stand a long time
Juan- Did you watch on you tube or review transcripts?
Sexpert- Both
Juan-You had the opportunity to ask Jodi about these photographs correct?
Sexpert says she's not here to talk about sexual behaviors.
Juan- But you sure talked about these photos when they were put on the screen
Juan- you chose to highlight this photo
Fonseca- Yes
Juan- You felt something these photo's were distasteful?
Sexpert- I felt the position of it was. This pic was before the baptism and this was highlighting his struggle
Recess
Juan has the baptized photo up. He asks the sexpert if there were nude photos of Jodi and wanted to know if she would consider that distasteful too.
Juan- You've lost your objectivity correct?
Sexpert- No I have not, let us not get distracted
Juan is asking Fonseca if she's a psychologist?
Sexpert- Yes.
Juan- you gave us many opinions
Juan- You made a moral judgement about the penis
Sexpert- I already answered it
Juan puts up text Jodi says "oh my gosh that is so hot i want to lick it up and then sit on it! U are so tasty.
Travis- I'm glad yo like it
Jodi- Oh yes I want to fuck you like a dirty, horny little school girl
In another text Jodi says to Travis "I want you to get scandalous with me"
The sexpert wants Juan to stop getting distracted about the sexual behavior.
Juan says "well Jodi doesn't find this talk distasteful"
The sexpert tells Juan the court reporter would like to be able to get his statements before he moves on to another subject, then Juan tells her to read a text and she says "Is that a request or command"
Sex tape is played. Well, Jodi's fake orgasm is. (Jodi has her ears covered in court) Travis mentions the 12 year old girl and Jodi laughs and says "you're bad and make me feel so dirty"
Juan is comparing the text about Jodi saying she wants to fuck like a dirty, horny school girl and the sex tape. Juan starts putting up all the dirty text Jodi had and the sexpert says that is was still Travis' fault. He was the one addicted to sex.
Juan states well the defendant was also Mormon wasn't she?
Sexpert- Yes a convert
Juan said same "juxtaposition" could be applied to Jodi who was also photographed in Mormon garb as well as naked
Juan is playing sex tape about Jodi talking about grinding Travis on a trip
Juan has a text that has Jodi talking about wanting to give TA a BJ and she'd like a facial in return
Jodi mentions in the text "we can just grind"
In sex tape Jodi mentions grinding. Sexpert says there is reference to jizzles in these conversations.
(This stupid sexpert keeps explaining that we shouldn't get distracted by the sexual behaviors. She's willing to talk about Travis' sex stuff, but not Jodi's.)
Juan- and after she kills Travis she goes to Utah and grinds with Ryan Burns.
Sexpert- Yes. This is a toxic relationship.
Lunch
There are currently 22 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 22 guests)