Originally Posted by *crickets*
Well shit...he could have paused for a second or two to let it sink in since IT'S KIND OF AN IMPORTANT POINT! What the hell...
Well shit...he could have paused for a second or two to let it sink in since IT'S KIND OF AN IMPORTANT POINT! What the hell...
Holy hell! I am laughing so hard at the new word I've now learned!! Thanks, Sylvian!! Although....my hubby didn't seem impressed when I shared with him hahaha. He could, perhaps, use a time out, yes??
It's not really inadmissable, it's the timing of when he is trying to get it in. Took him months to figure out it is valuable.Looks like Nurms is trying to get in his surrebuttal after all, just in the form of slipping in inadmissible shit during rebuttal.
Not popular, but I've said all along, Flores had too big a mouth.
"Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are" --- Benjamin Franklin
I've been saying that from day one. So, both a frantic, "fearing for her life" Jodi, and Travis the raging bull, in hot pursuit, managed to sidestep, literally, that bench w/o even pushing it aside. I wish Juan had made more of a point of this; hopefully in closing.
"I'm not talking about a person, I'm talking about the defendant." JM
Nurmi is such a slime ball for trying to get other evidence in, other than the shelves today.
So the prosecutors rebuttal means to Nurmi "get in what ever shit I can to get my client off, screw the rules of law"
The omitted closet shot is streaming now.
they are now showing the picture of the shelf with the hand on it
- Beauty is a beast.
OOOOOO... shelf tipped picture is on the live feed.
Hmm... something is wrong with me that I'm that excited about that shit
"The reason a dog has so many friends is that he wags his tail instead of his tongue." -Anonymous
great job of channeling Jodi...
It's the monitor that I mentioned a couple pages ago. The large screen is really only viewable from the Left side of the courtroom. The jury, witnesses and possible the family side with the reporters are the only ones that can see it. Everyone else has to see the evidence on monitors.
yeah, he spoke too much in my opinion both in stabby's interview and then on 48 hours
Mega projection screens, several of them ringing the courtroom, showing the videos, photos, etc.
"I'm not talking about a person, I'm talking about the defendant." JM
He thinks he cleverly snuck that in...... I can find no words to describe him. Anyone?
Looks like Nurms is trying to get in his surrebuttal after all, just in the form of slipping in inadmissible shit during rebuttal.
Sir Rebuttal is the one on the right...
Were you crying when you were stabbing him? --SuperJuan Martinez
Nobody believes a word out of your mouth. Why do you keep talking? -- ABC Interviewer to JA
Hum, he had to use his whole hand it appears. That isn't comparable to just your toes.
"Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are" --- Benjamin Franklin
I think Stabby is trying to figure out a way to get her shelf story changed at the last minute. She was whispering up a storm when JM was asking Flores questions.
Nurmi's not allowed to and he knows it, but he's obviously desperate. But, the judge has been disallowing it, after a sidebar each time of course. That's why we saw the Chris Hughes stuff dropped. Legally, he's not supposed to be able address anything that Martinez didn't already ask the witness about today. Martinez obviously did not discuss Chris Hughes or 48 hours, and Nurmi is not allowed to bring up things that Flores MAY have said in the past, even if on record, if that's not the line of questioning that was address on direct by the prosecution.
To that end, I don't know why they are bothering with a recess -- if it's to deal with this bs -- because it should not even be considered allowable by the judge.
Yes, someone would've fallen over it. And I doubt that if someone was in a fight for their life, they would bother to stop and pick the bench back up, much less reposition it perfectly in the closet.
Morever, the bench shoots down the need for Jodi to have ever climbed the shelves in her scenario; she could've just slid the bench over and hopped up on it. But, of course then she would've had to explained why she stopped to drag the bench back to where it was while she was "Running for her life" or after she murdered him.
"Well, it's YOUR fog..." - J. Martinez
Did anyone screen shot that?
"The reason a dog has so many friends is that he wags his tail instead of his tongue." -Anonymous
He is totally unethical and disrespectful to the judge as well as to the prosecutor. While the relationship between the defense and prosecutor is by nature adversarial, he has often shown disrespect to the judge.
"Before you embark on a journey of revenge, dig two graves" .. Confucius
"The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation " ...... Henry David Thoreau
Damn, missed it, maybe someone got a screen cap.
Excellent question!
I live in Arizona. It's a dust bowl here. And unless you have the best housekeeper on the planet, you're going to have a little dust buildup on top of your closet shelves...
He's a grade A Cunt.
There are currently 229 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 229 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
