Agreed. This witness is a true professional, not merely an advocate.Originally Posted by dizzyp
Aim high?
Frankly, she should be more realistic and aim for being human...
Were you crying when you were stabbing him? --SuperJuan Martinez
Nobody believes a word out of your mouth. Why do you keep talking? -- ABC Interviewer to JA
NCBlonde - The woman with orange face, platinum hair, and pink lipstick is sitting next to who I think is a friend of Stabby's.
OH MY GOD.
Bye Jodi.
BOOM.
holy crap this is huge
you are sooooooo right!!!!!!!
Stabby's writing "I fucked up. I thought I had this in the bag. I'm gonna kill this bitch."
You don't need a degree to clearly ascertain that what she is making sense. Common sense as opposed to the obvious nonsense that Samuels spewed.
OMG... I love how this witness gives her explanations in layman terms & explains the reality of it all, in a way we can relate to.
ღღ
I am going to claim my girl-crush on the Dr. right now....
JW is going to have a tough time impeaching this witness
Oh, Dr. Janeen DeMarte is absolutely nailing Jodi in the most professional way imaginable.
She even corrects Prosecutor Martinez without his reacting to it.
I wonder if Dr. Samuels is watching this testimony from his undisclosed location.
Exactly. JM chose well
Standing on your head does not demonstrate hyper-vigilance!
So if a person with these signs/symptoms through life, goes through something traumatic, how can they say that just because they were already present it means they are not now from PTSD?
Just for the record I am not saying JA has PTSD!!
Karma is only a bitch if you are!
I think that what Juan is doing here is ultra brilliant. He is writing bullet points down and in turn, I bet inviting the jury to follow along with their own notes. Huge impact if you go into deliberations and those notes are there to remind you of this testimony. I noticed he did the same thing in presenting the State's case in the beginning. This jury will remember everything that Juan has put out in front of them.
So is the next ploy for the DT is to state that JA was not in her right mind and by reason of insanity?
maybe the headstands help to protect her IQ when she doesn't have any tinfoil available to wear!Standing on your head does not demonstrate hyper-vigilance!
I would think there would have to be heightened signs/symptoms and new symptoms to show a person has PTSD. There would have to be a change from baseline behavior.
Jodi's continued refusal to even look at Dr DM is sooooo childish. Ugh.
I babysat my friend's toddler yesterday, and this is the kind of thing he would do: "I'm mad, so I am not gonna even look at you, you dumb poopy head!! So there!!"
At least he has the excuse of being three years old.
Were you crying when you were stabbing him? --SuperJuan Martinez
Nobody believes a word out of your mouth. Why do you keep talking? -- ABC Interviewer to JA
excellent point.. I wonder if his actual notes become part of the evidence that the jury can review... not sure about that.
Maybe this world is another planet's hell
― Aldous Huxley
Gawd again with the approach. Did Jen learn ANYTHING else in law school other than to approach and object? She is not easy to listen to even with her own witnesses. I hope this Dr. puts her smack on her ass!
Can't. Insanity under the law means the person doesn't know legal from illegal, and borderline people know what is legal and isn't. Besides an insanity defense requires notification pretrial.So is the next ploy for the DT is to state that JA was not in her right mind and by reason of insanity?
There are currently 221 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 221 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
