I haven't seen the segment he was talking about, so I can only guess at this point, until I do.
Now, I have seen pictures of the bathroom, but I'm not sure what the exact location of the box/closet was. This sight has a picture of the blood-stained box.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...Alexander.html
Looking at the box, the stain is rather dark, and so does not appear that it was diluted very much, in my opinion. To me, that would suggest there wasn't some great flood of water, but just an amount of water that traveled a distance.
I think it is relevant in the idea that Jodi showered with Travis' body, to wash herself off and to wash his body free of evidence/dna. It would seem logical to me that she was in the shower with Travis, as there would be no point to washing herself, then dragging the body and getting bloodied again while washing him off.
We know they found a cup in the shower. The presumption is that she filled that up to help rinse off the body. Imagine Jodi, in a small shower like that, trying to rinse off herself, and to be thorough in cleaning off evidence from Travis. Two people in the shower, in the laying/dead position he was in? No way was she getting that shower door closed.
So, there's Jodi with the door ajar, even possibly wide open, so she has room to move. Seems logical a fair amount of water would be hitting the floor. Not a flood of water because she didn't leave the water running. But, I'm sure at one point we've all taken a shower and discovered that we left the curtain a bit open, and stepped out into some puddles. I think that is what happened here. Water from splashing with the cup, and from the door being left ajar.
I don't think there was 2 inches of water on the floor, but the blood marks soaked 2 inches up the box. To me, a non-forensic person, that would be more indicative of a small amount of water, than a large amount. The cardboard was obviously porous and would soak up whatever water it was in contact with. That to me just means the water reached that distance, not that the floor was flooded with large amounts of water.
I hear ya. I've mentioned about females who are able to become firefighters and soldiers, or the woman who was able to lift the 2,000lb car off of her father.
I've also done lots of moving and I'm no weight-lifter. Not even close. I don't pump iron and I'm someone who keeps in shape more through diet than exercise. I'm 3 inches shorter and about 20lbs lighter than Jodi would've been at the time.
I have helped move many times. And I'm taking the vast majority of the move. Packing the vast majority of a 28ft. truck, by myself (multiple times), and haul around furniture. For me, the bigger issue was furniture being too large and thus hard to get a handle on, rather than being too heavy. It's not remotely anything that I do every day. Perhaps a couple of times a year. But I was still able to do it. And that's relevant because it's not like Jodi was doing this physical thing on a daily basis. She had one occasion where she had to push herself to the limit to do what she did. And she did it.
I look at women who run marathons, and there's no way in hell I would ever be able to do it, but that doesn't mean that no woman could do it. So, it's not fair for someone to say "I couldn't do that, so you couldn't do that, and no other woman including Jodi could do that." There are lots of things I can't do that others can, and vice versa.