I had a feeling you'd have a problem with my post. I'm just coming from the point of view of who each attorney represents in this perspective. JM represents Travis Alexander, his family and the State of Arizona. Nurmi and Willmott represent a lying, manipulating, self admitted killer. Yes of course I'm biased in who I'm pulling for.
But when I think overall who has proven their case? Definitely the prosecution. There is no doubt in my mind that Jodi planned this out, got in her car, took steps to hide her tracks, drove to Travis' house, murdered him, and then proceeded to try and cover it up, lie, make up crap about the victim in order to save her own life.
All the defense has proven to me is that she is more vicious that I originally thought when this trial started.