WOW! Seriously??? That would be a nightmare. I could see Stabby doing this to pull everyones chain.Originally Posted by AgathaAppleswine
WOW! Seriously??? That would be a nightmare. I could see Stabby doing this to pull everyones chain.
http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/...er-ryan-burns/
I thought you were saying, where is he?? The bomb threat happened today and Coconut hasn't been on the thread so maybe the two are connected. LOL
Shit. I hate to hear this..I thought they were all above board there due to the high profile of this case. I wonder if JM chewed his ass for allowing it.
that is despicable! I'm very sorry that you and your family must endure that!
I want to know when this interview is going to be aired, or will there be an injunction to prevent it from being shown? They said Stabby accused JM of being shady" in it. I only saw the part where she said she wanted the dp and talked about her mother.
That has to be so awful for your family to be put through that nightmare. I am so sorry!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JGqNG9Z8v4
The same Sheriff Arpaio who refused to allow the "starving" defenDANT to be provided supplemental nutrition, have her lawyers provide her with lunch, who had a deputy come in to argue to the court that he, the Sheriff, was not pleased with security measures in the courtroom regarding the defenDANT. But he allows her to schedule and hold an interview in his jail, minutes after the verdict is handed down? He's a disgrace, and we wouldn't be here now in this predicament save for his idiocy.
"I'm not talking about a person, I'm talking about the defendant." JM
Denn, it's out there. Google it, or search on Youtube. I have seen the whole thing, but it's in parts.
My bite is worse than my bark!
Sheriff Joe moved her to prevent further interviews. You know he doesn't put up with this kind of BS. So he made sure she couldn't give any more interviews
any one else curious where the hell dr drew is? lol or will we get an amazing inside scoop in an hr or so?
I am sorry for your loss.
With all this "I want to die bullshit", it's plain to see how Jodi has always operated. When she doesn't like something (Travis leaving her; getting M1) then threaten suicide. Make everyone jump through the "poor Jodi" hoops; validate her pain; stick around until she's ok again; let her have her way. She doesn't want to die. She wants to manipulate everyone until she gets what she wants. Her little wheels are turning in her head while she plans her next round of crap to get out of this. God help the people who have had the misfortune to have been in her life in any way, shape or form. I am seriously getting to the point that I wish she'd have a friggin' heart attack, drop dead and do everyone a huge favor.
That was a long letter and it seems to me she didnt really say anything
"Were you crying when you were stabbing him? How about when you cut his throat, were you crying then?"
"The difference between a Stumbling Block and Stepping Stone is the Character of the individual walking the path"
Yeah, some lady who was walking by the courthouse after work, saw the news camera's running, following the Arias family. No deputies. I wonder if the Jodi whacks are threatening the Alexander family.
And still...no word from Dr Drew HLN knows exactly what's going on, but Dr Drew, and everyone in that courtroom, was told not to talk to the media. DAMMIT!
:o)
Sneakers. Boy you are kind and patient posting and reposting that. Very admirable. Just wanted to say that.
"Before you embark on a journey of revenge, dig two graves" .. Confucius
"The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation " ...... Henry David Thoreau
What I find interesting is that there have been no new motions filed by either defense or prosecution in this case. Whatever happened probably means JA went rogue again and even her lawyers didn't know what she was going to do. She did go off on them as heard in the hallway after the verdict yesterday. She is not about to listen to them on anything. This is HER show and she is going to play it out how SHE wants to do it. She is an idiot.
now i see why trtavis always went back to her
dude was too nice
"Were you crying when you were stabbing him? How about when you cut his throat, were you crying then?"
"The difference between a Stumbling Block and Stepping Stone is the Character of the individual walking the path"
Yes, they may want to derail the rest of this case by forcing the judge to error. I would not put it past them or Stabby. If they can force the judge to error, they can file for a new trial. I can see them doing this since they have tried about every low down tactic they could think of in this case. Stabby cannot do anything to overturn the underlying juries verdict. BUT, the defense could force an error. I think the judge it too smart for that to happen.
^That.
Sheriff Joe is pissed that somebody in Maricopa County is getting more attention than he is, and by attention I mean good attention - Juan Martinez. He allowed the interview after the verdict to take place. He can go fuck himself.
Thank you. The thread moves fast and it's hard to find stuff sometimes
http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/...er-ryan-burns/
Letter to Ryan Burns, March 2009 from her jail cell to her alibi.
Welcome, Amarink!
Faking "incompetence" from a legal standpoint is very difficult. You have to be really, REALLY incompetent before this would become a factor, and Jodi absolutely is not. However, they have to go through the steps of having a professional check her out, just to be sure.
Here are some examples of what was NOT considered incompetence:
What Does Not Constitute Substantial Evidence
Courts have held that each of the following factual situations,
standing alone, did not present substantial evidence of doubt about defendant's mental competence:
- Defendant's bizarre actions or statements.
- Statements of defendant's family that defendant suffered from migraine headaches
- Defense counsel's statements that defendant was incapable of cooperating in his or her defense. People v Welch, supra, 20 C4th at 742 (disagreement between defense counsel and defendant about which defense to employ did not require court to order competency hearing).
- Mental health expert's testimony that defendant was immature, dangerous, psychopathic, or homicidal, or similar diagnosis that includes few references to defendant's ability to assist in his or her own defense. 20 C4th at 742. See also People v Hays (1976) 54 CA3d 755, 760, 126 CR 770 (psychiatric reports found defendant depressed and suffering from mild psychosis but expressed no doubt about defendant's mental competence).
- Defendant's inappropriate emotional response to a serious trial; statements of stepparents that defendant's behavior during trial was strange; earlier diagnosis by a court-appointed psychiatrist that defendant had a personality disorder;
- Defendant's acts of pleading guilty to a capital offense and
waiving a jury trial, allegedly amounting to a suicide attempt;
defendant's waiver of a penalty jury. People v Deere (1985) 41 C3d 353, 359, 222 CR 13 (disapproved on other grounds in 48 C3d at 1228 n9).- Defendant's decision not to argue in favor of life
imprisonment or present mitigating evidence. People v Howard (1992) 1 C4th 1132, 1164, 5 CR2d 268
Also, here are the criteria used for judging mental competence to stand trial:
http://www.umassmed.edu/forensictrai...uidelines.aspx
Last edited by nestlequikie; 05-09-2013 at 03:03 PM. Reason: Fixed vBulletin quoting/formatting errors.
Were you crying when you were stabbing him? --SuperJuan Martinez
Nobody believes a word out of your mouth. Why do you keep talking? -- ABC Interviewer to JA
Ok..thank you!
This is SO helpful!! So, she can't fake her break from reality. Whew....Welcome, Amarink!
Faking "incompetence" from a legal standpoint is very difficult. You have to be really, REALLY incompetent before this would become a factor, and Jodi absolutely is not. However, they have to go through the steps of having a professional check her out, just to be sure.
Here are some examples of what was NOT considered incompetence:
What Does Not Constitute Substantial Evidence
Courts have held that each of the following factual situations,
standing alone, did not present substantial evidence of doubt about
defendant?s mental competence:
? Defendant?s bizarre actions or statements.
? Statements of defendant?s family that defendant suffered from
migraine headaches
? Defense counsel?s statements that defendant was incapable of
cooperating in his or her defense. People v Welch, supra, 20 C4th
at 742 (disagreement between defense counsel and defendant about
which defense to employ did not require court to order competency
hearing).
? Mental health expert?s testimony that defendant was immature,
dangerous, psychopathic, or homicidal, or similar diagnosis that
includes few references to defendant?s ability to assist in his or her
own defense. 20 C4th at 742. See also People v Hays (1976) 54
CA3d 755, 760, 126 CR 770 (psychiatric reports found defendant
depressed and suffering from mild psychosis but expressed no
doubt about defendant?s mental competence).
? Defendant?s inappropriate emotional response to a serious trial;
statements of stepparents that defendant?s behavior during trial was
strange; earlier diagnosis by a court-appointed psychiatrist that
defendant had a personality disorder;
? Defendant?s acts of pleading guilty to a capital offense and
waiving a jury trial, allegedly amounting to a suicide attempt;
defendant?s waiver of a penalty jury. People v Deere (1985) 41
C3d 353, 359, 222 CR 13 (disapproved on other grounds in 48 C3d
at 1228 n9).
? Defendant?s decision not to argue in favor of life
imprisonment or present mitigating evidence. People v Howard (1992) 1 C4th 1132, 1164,
5 CR2d 268
Also, here are the criteria used for judging mental competence to stand trial:
http://www.umassmed.edu/forensictrai...uidelines.aspx
There are currently 128 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 128 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
