Granted, I was in a "fog" during a good part of his closing, totally tuning out when he got all "anal." But is it my imagination, or has Nurmi glossed over or ignored 99% of the facts in evidence? Also seems he just blew past the entire week or two prior to the killing, barely touching on the gas cans, car rental, phone being turned off; her planned or not planned trip to AZ. Even the killing scenario itself. Did he acutally lay out, in detail, the killing (up to the "fog" or course), getting the gun, the line backer attack, the shooting, him falling on her, blah, blah, blah. And post killing...suddenly finding her charger, the whole Ryan Burns hookup? Oh, I think I'll stay in my fog. Seems we're BACK TO THE SEX TAPE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![]()



Reply With Quote




"objective" evidence He is actually funny! Like the jury doesn't know he is JAs attorney and that isn't "objective".

