"You and some of your fellow jurors who are no longer with us asked Jodi some questions."
WTF Nurmi?
What possible purpose does that comment serve? Really, I would like to hear some theories, because I've got nothing.
"You and some of your fellow jurors who are no longer with us asked Jodi some questions."
WTF Nurmi?
What possible purpose does that comment serve? Really, I would like to hear some theories, because I've got nothing.
Were you crying when you were stabbing him? --SuperJuan Martinez
Nobody believes a word out of your mouth. Why do you keep talking? -- ABC Interviewer to JA
It is fair game but futile. Your cheer leading for the Defense doesn't sit with your assertions that Arias is guilty. Your selectively deafness makes no sense. Hopefully, the jurors will apply balance and an examination of testimony in this too.Originally Posted by coconut
Nurmi is trying his best but his attempts to draw in one dumb juror are so clumsy, so blatantly obvious that even the dumbest juror should spot it. He is working with the dross Arias used for a Defense but there is no conviction in his voice, no passion - almost a note of weariness.
His attempts to paint TA as an abuser make me cringe. Sexual fantasy or role playing between two consenting adults is not abuse if it uses imagination rather than real images. He knows this very well but hopes to shock one juror. No mention of Arias wanting to "Fuck him like a dirty, horny little schoolgirl', dress like one or wear braids. Double standards that the jury can't fail to spot. If TA was guilty of sexual deviancy, so was Arias. Nurmi's attempts to paint Arias as sexually abused were scuppered by his own client - right on the witness stand. His exasperation was plain to see on camera as Arias sniggered about her stress free sex with TA. Arias was adamant that all sex was consensual, ALWAYS. She enjoyed it. Hardly the testimony of an abused woman. Nurmi is flogging a dead horse here but it is all he has.
Arias loved the schoolgirl stuff but something tells me that you won't find that so repulsive or offensive.
"Ms Arias do you have a problem with your memory? " ....
... "Sometimes I lose my memory when mean old men are yellin' at me and grillin' at me and asking me so many questions all the god damn time"
- Courtney Pauroso 'Aria' Spoof YouTube
It is fair game but futile. Your cheer leading for the Defense doesn't sit with your assertions that Arias is guilty. Your selectively deafness makes no sense. Hopefully, the jurors will apply balance and an examination of testimony in this too.
Nurmi is trying his best but his attempts to draw in one dumb juror are so clumsy, so blatantly obvious that even the dumbest juror should spot it. He is working with the dross Arias used for a Defense but there is no conviction in his voice, no passion - almost a note of weariness.
His attempts to paint TA as an abuser make me cringe. Sexual fantasy or role playing between two consenting adults is not abuse if it uses imagination rather than real images. He knows this very well but hopes to shock one juror. No mention of Arias wanting to "Fuck him like a dirty, horny little schoolgirl', dress like one or wear braids. Double standards that the jury can't fail to spot. If TA was guilty of sexual deviancy, so was Arias. Nurmi's attempts to paint Arias as sexually abused were scuppered by his own client - right on the witness stand. His exasperation was plain to see on camera as Arias sniggered about her stress free sex with TA. Arias was adamant that all sex was consensual, ALWAYS. She enjoyed it. Hardly the testimony of an abused woman. Nurmi is flogging a dead horse here but it is all he has.
Arias loved the schoolgirl stuff but something tells me that you won't find that so repulsive or offensive.
"Ms Arias do you have a problem with your memory? " ....
... "Sometimes I lose my memory when mean old men are yellin' at me and grillin' at me and asking me so many questions all the god damn time"
- Courtney Pauroso 'Aria' Spoof YouTube
Yes, an admitted error will allow this poor victimized woman resume her pure life on the outside. Neither Ron Jeremy nor his cock would agree with you Coconut!Here we go, changing stories of Flores & Horne!
Is Nurmi all done???
:o)
Oh..... Stabby is too smart to make up these bad lies.
Well, that explains it. She does have a Einstein-like IQ.
Wow....
Riveting closing argument. Look at the man in the white shirt sleeping in court.
FYI- Nurmi commented on: (part II after 1st break, before lunch)
* Sitting naked shower pic (neck down)
* Dr Horne down to up stab instead of using a gun
* cleaned, cld TA left msg went to Utah doesn't make sense
* domestic violence
* hand injury pic w/ sis
* sexual assault while asleep & over the desk
* fall '06 - June '08 relationship -talked. texted, phone sex, etc
* June 4th youtube, woke up had sex, bedroom became crime scene
* state said she's a liar nothing happened the way she said, but what she is saying is true.
* state says JA was never victim of abuse bcs not in diary
* ALav victims do not report
* May 10 '08 phone sex 45mins said 12 year old orgasm 2x's
* Media craving as state says
* State said he didn't abuse previous girlfriends but this relationship different
* Nothing wrong w/ intercourse w/ Deanna nor Jodi (when she consented)
* ALav agrd was character assassination on sex tape re: Abe
* Punching bag needed for when JA wasn't around
* Interest in cage fighting
* Team Freedom TA said those people are soulless wanting to drink
* Doc JD scripted testimony
* Lies- sure JA lied so did Travis lied about JA being a stalker
* Why take a pic of stalker naked on bed
* How fearful go to PPL meetings balloon fest niagra falls you don't do this w/ stalker
* shower pics neck down clear because was focused & deleting pics
* Ceiling pic & TA pissed when drops camera
* Gun on top closet shelf JA picked the most inconevient location could have said it was elsewhere
* Descrepency ALav said was in closet
* Doc Horne vs Det Flores shot 1st someone lying & its not JA
* Linebacker dive fuckin' kill you bitch
* JA loses memory confirmed by Doc Dick PTSD
* knife in dishwasher iffy
* she knew she remembers shes lying if so could have made up a better story w/ years to think about this & the fog is not made up it is a inconvenient, would be better for JA to explain the whole event.
* If lying JA would have thought of something better after all these years
* JA was forced into defending her life
* 5:29:20 & 5:32:60 something happened between that time
Last edited by Cocopop; 05-03-2013 at 11:35 AM.
ღღ
Well I missed about 90% of the morning session. Done with meetings just in time for lunch. At least its only an hour.
Did I miss anything major?
edit to remove Double Post
Last edited by Cocopop; 05-03-2013 at 11:29 AM.
She better savor these next few days, her life is done, just as it should be!
My apologies if this has already been asked, but if Jodi were to shot Travis as he was lunging at her how did the bullet after entering above his eyebrow travel back towards Jodi (barely skimming his frontal lobe?) Particularly when she claims she was holding it out in front of her clutching it with both hands?
I honestly thought I heard that wrong. What a fucking idiot he is.
I honestly thought I heard that wrong. What a fucking idiot he is.
Silly little lie, wow that's a nice way to white wash the ninja story!
So should they reward her by setting her free because she could not "think of something better?"
I'll say again she's the worst premeditated murderer ever.She thought she was crafty and smart but was very obviously not.If she wanted to get away with the gun instead of staging a robbery buy another 25 put it in grandpas house take his gun ,do the crime and the robbery wouldn't have ever been called in.Grandpa never had nor knew the serial numbers .She could have bought the 25 from a private party and no one would be the wiser.She's not slick.As far as the gas cans was it investigated that Ryan Burns maybe saw the 3 cans in her trunk?or since she bought at the pump in Utah did Valeros have a tape?of her filling the cans? There's no such thing as the perfect murder and this was no where close.
That was my point a long time ago. Her lunging story could have been proven false with a ballistics expert. I have seen them, for example, prove how and what position the shooter when the victim was shot. I think that he had to be on the floor to get that angle. On the floor with his face to the side. She shot him from a little behind the head.
Funny, she was smart enough to realize she had to do a lunge in her testimony because someone might figure that out. Why I was so disappointed a ballistics expert was not called. A true story would have been told.
Says it all, doesn't it?
This site is having HUGE problems today...
So the defense' stance is that she shouldn't be found guilty of M1 because she "would have come up with better lies" and would have had "better opportunities" to kill Travis whilst he was in the shower!? What the fuck?
........she only makes up these good lies.
"Of all the emotions, the most dangerous emotion is love." P.D James
"Do you not realize, my son, with how little wisdom this world is run?" Baron von Oxenstiema"
Oh, if Jodi was guilty she would have come up with a better lie?
Absolutely acquit her then. Whew. I have to remember that people who are actually guilty of crimes only make up really good lies.
He probably got this idea from the blonde defense attorney on HLN. Who, by the way, is now changing her side after JM closing yesterday. Up to then, she had been pro-defense and I could not stand to watch her.
It's kind of hard to give an credit to someone who scored so high in most of the psychological indicators, and was obviously having a 'psychotic break' from reality, to even do the things she did. A don't think a high IQ is an indication of mental stability. In fact, many of the most intelligent people in the world are considered extremely mentally ill. It's history..look it up.
:o)
What is Nurmi doing with his hand to his mouth? It looks weird.
There are currently 224 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 224 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
