Jodi Ann Arias shot and stabbed her ex-boyfriend Travis Alexander to death (Part II)

[MISFIT]

Finally, Wilmot shut her mouth! Whew!

[Reaper-Creeper]

Game on! Shut up Jenny and watch how the big dogs play.

[phantompoet]

Judge sounds annoyed with the defense

[ImBatman!]

Can we be done now? PLEASE????

[Reaper-Creeper]

Hired gun biotch!!

[alyoop]

JUAN

[Ruthven]

Go get 'em baby!

[CreepyGus]

Juan is coming out blazing!

[Sylvian]

Oh wow! that face juan just pulled "nothing more than a hired gun!"

[dizzyp]

now we can go

*BOOM*

right on JUAN!

[MISFIT]

Juan is coming out blazing!

This is why I watch.

[Freethinker]

OH,OH!!

[Sneakers the Wonder Dog]

JM bringing up the Tennessee child custody case where Dr Geffner's testimony was tossed out

Keep objecting Jenny, we want the jury to know that you're hiding shit!

[AnnieBelle]

Game on! Shut up Jenny and watch how the big dogs play.

At least this guy seems to give yes and no answers! Go, Juan!!!

[lorizfree]

Go Juan!!!

[Ruthven]

Ugh look at that fool's stupid grin.

[Reaper-Creeper]

What is it like to read a court opinion that basically says your full of shit, and you get to read it over and over again in front of another jury!

[CreepyGus]

Did he get free dental care too?

[M Joy]

Maybe. Maybe not. That is good enough for the defense team. Medical Examiners only have dead patients. They really should have a trauma surgeon testify about the possibility because they see gunshot victims in the raw state, and yes they do live.

I don't trust The State. They changed their story. Cops lie. Prosecutors lie. The ME changed his testimony and lied about what he told Flores when. They had such a strong case with great evidence. Why did they have to do that?

Just the appearance of inconsistency and changing story takes away their credibility. The State will do anything to get their conviction.

This witness is massive. He comes across as more objective than just about anyone. He is giving his opinion on black and white stuff. And he's not going out on a limb at all. The defense is using him to highlight all the flaws and holes in the prosecution case and I think it is working.

why didn't the defense team hire a neurosurgeon to rebut Dr. Horn's original testimony? Because they knew they couldn't get one that would do that. They paid this Dr. Geffner to do it for them in surrebuttal. He looked at reports. thats all he did in this case.

[Bellaboo]

I love Juan' s take no prisoners style. He will make mincemeat out of this witness in short order

[alyoop]

oh goody, the Dr is citing his own without merit testimony. super

[olgasbunghole]

SERIOUSLY! Did the DT really think that Juan wouldn't find this info out!?!?!?!?!

[PopRocks]

what is nurmi laughing at?

[Mochachino]

Wooooooooo hooooooooooooooooooo!

[wasthinking]

http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx...urr&SizeDisp=7
O'ROURKE v. O'ROURKE
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville.
November 3, 2009 Session.


Despite the trial court's announced sanction, it gave Dr. Geffner a great deal of latitude in his testimony at trial, even in the face of continued objections by Father's attorney. During almost a full day of testimony, the witness was able to fully express his criticisms of the purported defects in the evaluations performed by the other psychiatrists and psychologists in this case, and his opinions of the relative fitness of the parties for parental responsibilities, even though he never met Father.