I'm waiting for him to call Dr. Demarte "one of those young whipper-snappers".
How 'bout Doc G trying to wipe his hands entirely clean of Arias ....
Nope I didn't diagnose her, I just read the reports of what the other doctors reported.
He reviewed Dr JD diagnosis of BPD & "his" opinion is she does not have an understanding of how these tests are used because they are outdated. Her MCMI is questionable.
THIS being said by a doctor who has NEVER met nor spoke to the murderess
Last edited by Cocopop; 05-01-2013 at 01:27 PM.
ღღ
there are alot of young people who are just lost and drift through life,especially here in California.There's been alot of talk about her parents not caring.She most likely was a latchkey kid who's parents worked crazy restrurant hours,They worked to provide for their kids but never spent much time with them.Their job was done when she became of age and became rebellious.
wait - so he says she couldn't have bpd because it would have to be a combo of tests and interviews and research, which she did and he did not, but he is saying she found bpd based on only the test - wtf is he talking about!!!
Maybe. Maybe not. That is good enough for the defense team. Medical Examiners only have dead patients. They really should have a trauma surgeon testify about the possibility because they see gunshot victims in the raw state, and yes they do live.
I don't trust The State. They changed their story. Cops lie. Prosecutors lie. The ME changed his testimony and lied about what he told Flores when. They had such a strong case with great evidence. Why did they have to do that?
Just the appearance of inconsistency and changing story takes away their credibility. The State will do anything to get their conviction.
This witness is massive. He comes across as more objective than just about anyone. He is giving his opinion on black and white stuff. And he's not going out on a limb at all. The defense is using him to highlight all the flaws and holes in the prosecution case and I think it is working.
I'm so tired of this fool and his "jigsaw puzzles"![]()
how can you assess a test without assessing a person at the same time?
OMG Juan - PLEASE mop the floor with this tool
"The reason a dog has so many friends is that he wags his tail instead of his tongue." -Anonymous
Yes. If not for the DP factor, all of this testimony should not have been allowed.
JW is seriously being a tease today. She keeps asking questions that make it seems like she's wrapping up but then Geffner just keeps droning on and on and on......
sigh. enough with the sustained objections and willmott asking to approach! Sustained means you can't ask about that anymore. Move on!!
Last edited by M Joy; 05-01-2013 at 01:37 PM.
That sums it up nicely
So does the defense apparently
Dr. Geffner says Dr. Demarte's testing is "outdated". This coming from someone who doesn't know how how move a computer cursor.
he didn't examine Stabby and he didn't examine TA's body but Dr Demarte is wrong and Dr Horne is wrong. Maybe he can tell us why Gabby Giffords didn't up and tackler Jared Loughner?
What a fool!
I am wondering if this is going to be wrapped up today with Willmont still up there with her 1000 questions.
THANK GOD
Thank fucking goodness!
Go JM!
Thanks for the quick link sneakers!!
So going over the Autopsy Report, this is the only findings Dr. Horne writes about TA's brain:
"The wound track perforates the anterior frontal skull near the the superior orbital bone and traverses the right anterior fossa, without gross evidence of significant intracranial hemorrahage or apparent cerebral injury (although examination of brain tissue is somewhat limited by the decomposed nature of the remains). The projectile re-enters the facial skeleton near the midline and the wound track terminates in the left cheek."
There is more about the gunshot wound, but this is the only part the discuss' the brain.
So Dr. Horne made no remarks about the Dura Matter! BOOM!!
There are currently 14 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 14 guests)