I'm not getting this line of questioning. What difference does it make if Martinez saw the test questions to the test that Dr. D administered to Jodi? Didn't the defense see the test questions of the tests Dr. Fog gave Jodi? And probably before he gave her the test?
Isn't the prosecutor privy to evidence in the case? Doesn't he have the right to see the test questions and the results of what Jodi answered?
"Well, it's YOUR fog..." - J. Martinez
They are reporting NO ONE is taking notes, including the one that usually does.
Jen is NOT doing herself any favors. If I had a rolled up newspaper, I would smack her little yapping trap.
"The difference between theory and reality is this: In theory, there is no difference between the two. In reality, there is."
If you lay down with dogs, you should't be surprised when you wind up with fleAs.
Illegitimi non carborundum!
Didn't she just break copyright by showing the whole world the questions?
- Beauty is a beast.
Jen's desperate! Next question:
JW: "Did you come in the front door or the back door of the court today?"
JD: "I came in the front door."
JW: "Right! You came in the front door, but you could have come in the back door if you wanted to, right?"
JD: "Correct!"
JW: "Buuuuut YOU chose not to! Right?"
JD: "I would need someone to show me where the back door was, but that is correct!"
JW: "Oh, so you don't know where the back door is?"
JD: "Correct!"
JW: "Oh, so you don't know? Right?"
JD: "Correct!"
JW: "Huh? HoKay, Awright!"
Look at that mess Jenny has up there. One of the other reasons I love JM is because he doesn't need all that, he knows his shit off the top of his head.
You want to see inappropriate outburst of anger?? How's this:
I WANT TO JUMP THROUGH MY SCREEN, CHARGE THE DEFENSE TABLE, AND KNOCK EVERY ONE OF JODI'S HORSE TEETH OUT OF HER GROSS, BLOATED, FILTHY MOUTH, AND RIP THE STUPID, PURPOSELY OUTDATED, SYMPATHY-GARNERING GLASSES OFF HER UGLY, DRAWN FACE, BEND ALL HER BONEY, NASTY FINGERS BACK UNTIL HER THE TENDONS IN HER WRIST SNAP, AND POKE HER IN HER WONKY, FUCKED UP, BLACK, SHARK EYES!!!!!! I HATE HER!! I TRULY DO!!!!!
That's all.....
WildAboutTrial @WildAboutTrial
As I watch Willmott I am reminded of a show called Daria that used to be on MTV. #JodiArias
LMAO!! For those that dont know what Daria looks like, google image it. SPOT ON
Here is access to one of Demarte's research publication. I've published. It aint easy to publish research, because your work must stand up to peer review. On the other hand, publishing a book is not research it is a review and doesn't have peer review.
Timing of Menarche and the Origins of Conduct Disorder
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2242428/
This is a copyright infringement case now, not a murder case.Originally Posted by NCBlonde
Demarte is SMART. Asking Willmott to show her what she's referring to.
When in doubt, cast about...
Nowhere fast.
It is her effort to show that Dr. D is "dishonest".
BOOM, Jenny! She is totally discredited now!! Well done.
Were you crying when you were stabbing him? --SuperJuan Martinez
Nobody believes a word out of your mouth. Why do you keep talking? -- ABC Interviewer to JA
Is JW getting to the bottom of her stack? Could she give up before lunch?
Sounds like the Lady Doc downloaded a bootleg test off of Google Docs! Pearson Tests Inc wants their money...
Exactly, that is an excellent point.
Were you crying when you were stabbing him? --SuperJuan Martinez
Nobody believes a word out of your mouth. Why do you keep talking? -- ABC Interviewer to JA
hahaha someone in the forum said that a few days ago, but I think they compared Daria with Jodi. Not sure.
YOUR KILLING ME!Jen's desperate! Next question:
JW: "Did you come in the front door or the back door of the court today?"
JD: "I came in the front door."
JW: "Right! You came in the front door, but you could have come in the back door if you wanted to, right?"
JD: "Correct!"
JW: "Buuuuut YOU chose not to! Right?"
JD: "I would need someone to show me where the back door was, but that is correct!"
JW: "Oh, so you don't know where the back door is?"
JD: "Correct!"
JW: "Oh, so you don't know? Right?"
JD: "Correct!"
JW: "Huh? HoKay, Awright!"
Here's the look JA gave while JW was looking through her pile of papers
ღღ
Here is the abstract of janeen's dissertation:
The heterogeneity of antisocial behavior: Evidence for distinct dimensions of physical aggression, rule-breaking, and social aggression.
DeMarte, Janeen A. in Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, Vol 70(10-B), 2010, 6545.
Abstract
Despite considerable heterogeneity in both manifestation and outcome, antisocial behavior (ASB) is often conceptualized as a unitary behavioral construct. However, there is growing evidence for distinct (albeit correlated) aggressive (AGG: physical attack or bullying) and non-aggressive rule breaking (RB: underage drinking, stealing, and lying) forms of ASB, though this literature has been inconsistent. There is also evidence of a third possible dimension, termed social aggression (SA). SA involves aggressive behavior that uses social relationships or social status as the vehicle of harm (e.g., gossiping, social rejection). Critically, however, no study has yet to examine whether these three behavioral dimensions are indeed empirically distinct. The current series of studies sought to do just that by examining SA, AGG, and RB in both a normative and high-risk adjudicated sample. In Chapter 2, the factor structure of ASB was examined by conducting a series of confirmatory factor analyses. Findings uniformly suggested that the three-factor model best described the data in both samples, providing compelling evidence that SA, AGG, and RB are indeed distinct, albeit correlated, forms of ASB. The study presented in Chapter 3 sought to extend these findings by moving beyond the factor structure of SA, AGG, and RB by examining risk and protective factors that might account for similarities and differences across dimensions. I aimed to evaluate how the biological, psychological, cognitive, and personality correlates of ASB are independently related to each of the three dimensions, and further, how these predictors may differentiate and/or unite the dimensions. Results support both meaningful distinctions and considerable overlap across dimensions. Collectively, these results offer support for the notion that ASB is best conceptualized as a multi-dimensional, rather than uni-dimensional, construct. Namely, SA, AGG, and RB appear to be meaningfully distinct forms of ASB that are united by a common set of deficits. Interestingly, though the factor structure remains constant across both samples, the correlates that predict these dimensions varied across the normative and deviant sample. The results of the present series of studies have intriguing research and clinical implications. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
JD: "Say that again in a different way because you don't make sense you stupid bitch"
Wilmott is always all over the place and just chaotically flinging shit to the wall in a desperate attempt to see if it sticks. Such a sorry excuse for an attorney.
IMO, the Doctor is much smarter than JW.
Good morning everyone!
Nothing like an amateur who is clueless trying to appear smarter than the professional.
Some people need to calm their asses down. Wow.
Also, who thinks JW will wrap her cross up with JD today? I sincerly hope so.
I love that.."say that in a different way."
"Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; They listen with the intent to reply." ~ anonymous
"Keep calm and sing Soft Kitty"
"it is what it is!"
I think she may, though like you I'm very hopeful. I can't listen to JW yapping anymore.
There are currently 251 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 251 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
