Anyone remember the date Samuals signed on to the Def? tia
Anyone remember the date Samuals signed on to the Def? tia
"Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are" --- Benjamin Franklin
If the defendant is charged by a criminal complaint or indictment, then regardless of whether the defendant is convicted of criminal conduct against the victim, the limitations period for any cause of action brought by the victim against the defendant for criminal conduct is extended for one year from the final disposition of the criminal proceedings. This only applies against the defendant and defendant's personal assets. ARS 12-511.
Out, damned spot! out, I say! .... Here?s the smell of the blood still: all the perfumes of Arabia will not sweeten this little hand!
"Stop being dicks to noobs." -mydeathspace
...
Last edited by lisam2013; 04-22-2013 at 11:18 AM.
So, you've appointed yourselves deputies for Juan Martinez, and you're going to track him down and present him to Juan? Or just for the hell of it? Or what, exactly? I don't see what you're trying to do here.
Also, flees?
What does any of this have to do with stalking the guy online? Posting his birthdate, mother's maiden name, everywhere he might have lived, etc. etc.?
Lets talk about that ring finger. I don't think it was broken. I think she cut a tendon when she was stabbing Travis. When the tendon is cut or even nicked, it freezes the joint disabling it from straightening out.
Isnt it ironic that she can no longer get a ring on that finger?
I can't find exact date -- but this article shows his notes when administering a test to Jodi, in early 2010. (The picture of his notes appears to be 1-15-10, but HLN says it was March 15, 2010.)
![]()
A nap is only nice when it's a luxury, not a necessity.
i don't think alyce is done testifying, doesn't wilmontt get another crack at her now that jm finshed his cross?? isn't that how it worked w/ jodi - nurmi got the last word?? i just finished watching and the judge said to finish up her testimony and the other issue, and wilmont didn't say no to further cross, she just said no about asking a question about the last jury question
JM is a brilliant prosecutor and I think many people misunderstand that it's not his job to be NICE to witnesses.....his job is to get the TRUTH out of them. He is the only one who can stand strong and fight for the rights of the victim. And if he has to hold the witnesses by the ankles and shake 'em down, so be it. Their testimony, so far, has been total bullshit. And we know that because of the prosecutor and jury questions, not because of the testimony given under direct by the defense team.
...
Last edited by lisam2013; 04-22-2013 at 11:18 AM.
Right! I don't want to sound the least bit critical of people's views on the tactics of the attorneys. However, it seems that in recent times more and more people are losing their understanding of the basic principles involved. The system is adversarial. That is, there are two sides, and the rules of the institution, evolved over centuries, demands that each of the two parties vigorously attack the other's presentation in order for the system to discern the truth and find Justice. The judge interprets and enforces the rules. She is the only neutral person in the room. The jury decides on the facts. As between the Prosecution and the Defense, they are not engaged in a co-operative venture. They are supposed to vigorously oppose each other. The process may be messy, we may not like the opponents, and it may well be the worst system we know of--except for all the others.
"Of all the emotions, the most dangerous emotion is love." P.D James
"Do you not realize, my son, with how little wisdom this world is run?" Baron von Oxenstiema"
sorry if this is redundant but that "Jodi Arias stars in Psycho" segment on HLN After Dark was freakin' erie!!! must see TV.
here's a blog that documents the same comparisons: w/photos
http://www.chathousenews.com/2013/02...hat-house.html
Maybe this world is another planet's hell
― Aldous Huxley
...
Last edited by lisam2013; 04-22-2013 at 11:19 AM.
I disagree. Nurmi discussed anal way more than JM. Nurmi started this shit, and I can't believe how much anal we all have been subjected to. JM must rebut anal because the implication is that TA wanted anal because he was a pedophile. I feel anal for even discussing how much anal has been discussed. NO MORE ANAL PLEASE.
This is not about helping the case. I didn't say that. Nothing anyone says on MDS will help the case...obviously. MDS is a great source for information about the case. A great source of opinion and fact about the case. Many if not all members have debated about the evidence in the case, the progress of the case, the players in the case and the eventual outcome of the case.
Conspiracy Alert
![]()
There are currently 324 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 324 guests)