Something is up with the defense witness Matthew McCartney.
I was reading some of the court minutes dated 8/10/2011 and I saw this:
"Advisory Counsel, Victoria Washington addresses possible issues with witness, Matthew McCartney as stated on the record."
Is Matthew McCartney the reason Victoria Washington was eventually replaced?
Also this:
I was reading on the awful site "Jodi Arias is innocent" a while back and there was a post from someone only identified as mm (at that time) and this is what he wrote:"
mm says:
January 3, 2013 at 6:29 pm
Jason, I like how direct you are. What am I?
1. I am a man with a family who comes first. Yes even before Jodi.
Your right Jason they will pay for the plane ticket but nothing else. My job may not be waiting for me when I get back. My first obligation is to my family.
2. I was asked if I would lie for Jodi. I said yes. So yes, that makes a me liar. That?s probably why they haven?t called me."The above is found in the comment section on this page :
http://jodiariasisinnocent.com/jodi-...s-is-innocent/
This was written in response to someone who asked why he wasn't testifying for the defense. Later, the site reposted his comment with a title of Matt McCartney (comment re-post)
http://jodiariasisinnocent.com/matt-...i-arias-trial/ , thus identifying mm as Matt McCartney.
So...the defense has a witness on their list who has said on this website that he would lie for Jodie. I'm surprised the idiots at that website haven't deleted those posts yet. I took screenshots in case they do.
What do you all think? Who is this Matt McCartney guy?