Regardless of the outcome, I hope Travis' family sues her for character assassination.
Regardless of the outcome, I hope Travis' family sues her for character assassination.
After rewatching some of the end bits, and watching Jodi's mom and aunt (?) laughing and giggling happily along while she is describing what she remembers of the VERY brutally butchering of a man to death, I cant help but wonder if the jury members were watching them and feeling as disgusted as I was about their behavior? Will seeing her OWN family's seeming lack of concern for her make the jury feel sorry for her... wonder what her upbringing was like with such careless people... and ultimately sway their decision because some small bit of sympathy got mixed in there because of it? Just a random thought, but one I hope doesn't occur. She doesnt deserve sympathy.
I hope the jury members have some well thought out amd interesting questions, like some that have been posed here... or some we haven't even thought of! Its going to be interesting to try and see -thru their questions- where their thinking is.
Hopefully it will be a little bit of something interesting before the experts are paraded on tell us what a "victim" Jodi was and blah blah blah.
Preview for Nancy Grace (I know this is the repeat from 8pm but I missed it), it shows Jodi on the stand, "near tears" and Nurmi asks if she has memories of slashing Travis' throat. She replied, "No. I feel like I'm the person that deserves to sit with those memories...that I don't have right now."
Seriously fuck this bitch.
"so he ejaculated on your face and threw you some candy?"
Does anyone know what time the trial broadcasts tomorrow?
Poor Travis. I felt terrible watching him in that video. He seemed engaging and just someone who was really a nice person. He gave her money, let her keep her car in his garage, bought Cinnabons for her when she was out of town. I believe when he realized how fucked up she was, he started to back off. She hated the fact she could not control him. Too bad Juan Martinez allowed her to control the questioning. She is so fucking shrewd. Hope the jury sees through it all.
For comparison, I checked Wendi Andriano's number of questions. Court minutes show there were 11.
On appeal, def argued 'irrelavant' ones were allowed and also claimed prosecution misconduct unfairly prejudice the jury to spur those questions.
Appeals court disagreed with their arguments.![]()
yeah, this section lead me to believe she is never going to tell us what happened. It's the last memory that is between her and Travis. It's so sick (to use a clinical term)
I thought she went to the Bishop to tell of TRAVIS's sexual activities. Don't remember her confessing hers.
The holster is brand new.
Agreed, as she added the holster she added prep time...which can be considered premeditation.
I am not exactly sure that a fugue state or fog state allows her to do everything she did after the alleged gun shot. I am having trouble with her saying she remembers feelings and heard the knife clang on the floor. Oh and yes, that she was screaming. Hearing, feeling and screaming memories are stored in amygdala and hippocampus and I am guessing that there wouldn't be snippets. I am sort of amazed that someone who is a visual as her wouldn't have visual memories. Since she reports having absolutely no memories of the cutting and stabbing, cleaning up and driving it seems so self-serving. I don't believe her. I've seen lots of deception, and saying one has no memory is a common condition. On the other hand, extreme rage is like an emotional overload and will invite memory loss...but not after the rage is gone. They are going to say she has PTSD but I would only believe that if the PTSD is related to her killing someone she loved, not from the alleged abuse. I doubt I answered your question.
Agree! I don't hate her yet. I am more in the disgusted range. It's almost like she is taunting us.
I will always believe the heart stab was first...not due to forensic evidence, but because it is so symbolic of how badly she wanted to hurt him. It also fits the level of rage.
Agreed. Plus they typically are so smoove and charming, that some people will believe them. They are more animated than she is.
My JURY Questions:
When did you get the Brazilian wax? Did you get waxed in anticipation of having sex with Travis?
Where in the house are the plastic cups kept?
Where are the clothing you wore? Did you dispose of them together or separately?
When did you first suspect that Mimi to Cancun?
That video played on Dr. Drew was eerie!
Is there a link to this new video anywhere? Out driving around and nowhere near a Tv to watch it =(
Did you know there's a twitter for Jodi's bangs? @jodiariasbangs It's pretty funny.
My juror question: "Bitch, are you crazy?"
Quote of the day: Nurmi: "did part of you wish it had been you lying dead on that bathroom floor?" Jodi: "what part would that be?"
Seriously, this trial is like Crack to me. I don't know what I'll do when it's over! But every time I start to get caught up in the general WTF'ery of it all I think about the pictures of what she did to Travis and remember what this is really about.
I have now really thought about how she killed him. She became enraged when he refused to take her on the trip. She stabbed him, he stumbled to the sink. She stabbed his back and head. He tried to fight her and to get away from her. When she talked about how she tried to get away from him, she was talking about the reverse. Then she got him down and straddled him and slit his throat. Dragged him back to the shower area. He was maybe still gasping for breath. She shot him as a last resort knowing that the gun was stolen. She shoved him in the shower, cleaned up and left. She thought she was so clever. I am was thrilled to know that the camera survived the wash cycle, or the bleach job. She never thought she would get caught. Her eyes are as dead as her soul.
OMG! For the first time ever I have caught up and actually reading the current posts! It is so good to follow this trial with others who are as obsessed as I am. I have been recovering from knee surgery and have had lots of down time to really follow every detail and every piece of evidence. My family thinks I am crazy! I can't wait to hear the questions from the jurors. I found her addition of a holster to lie about the gun was one of the dumbest things ever. The last thing she needed was ANYTHING that would add another step or another second of time to an already impossible tale. Not to mention it also requires her to go back and find the holster and to add it to the list of evidence she had to dispose of! I think the timing of the birth of her cold sore could not have been better, matched todays line of questioning perfectly.
Not yet that I know of. The Dr Drew HLN facebook page states they'll have it posted within the hour
https://www.facebook.com/DrDrewHLN
"so he ejaculated on your face and threw you some candy?"
I don't see how he could have possibly been breathing as she cut him all the way to his spine. I think she shot him to support her ninja story. She was trying to make it look like there was more than one person. I think that's why she didn't shoot him dead while he was asleep. I've no doubt this murder was pre-meditated.
There are currently 78 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 78 guests)