LOL - s'all good!! Happy to be a part of the hoedi bashfest!! She can suck a dick. Sorry she's already done that, 654,345,876 times in her life already!!!![]()
LOL - s'all good!! Happy to be a part of the hoedi bashfest!! She can suck a dick. Sorry she's already done that, 654,345,876 times in her life already!!!![]()
I hate to tell you, women stay. I volunteered at a center, I had to quite because I couldn't take it any more. I know more than one handful of women that stayed with assholes that molested children. THREE I could name but won't that the husband got their own minor daughter pregnant! That was years ago ... to this day, I cry as I write this. Can you imagine a little 11 yr old, her mother rejects her to stay with the father, CP involved of course and the poor kid gets shipped into the foster care system for the rest of her life. Long after the prick was out of his 2 yr prison sentence and the F'ing mother living with him! She even tried to get the baby! She wanted the baby but not her own daughter.
Okay, considering that she has told at least 2 different versions of the porn lie, how can the judge even consider allowing the information to be presented as evidence?
I know the prosecutor will be able to put someone on the stand to refute it; to say that there was not one shred of any kind of porn found on Travis' computer or in his home, but what good does that do? The damage will be done. All they have to do is put the words "child porn" out there and they are out there forever. It's such a disgusting and slanderous thing to do, to the victim.
I don't understand how this can be legal.
For heaven's sake, even IF Travis was looking at those pictures -- which he so obviously wasn't -- what in the hell does that have to do with her butchering him like an animal? Not a damn thing. It doesn't even go to her "abuse" claim. There is no reason in the world for the judge to allow this to happen. None.
sorry if I was too brief, I never intended YOU thought where is throat was slit. Only the part where you thought bent over in the shower, and MY offering was, it wouldn't be hard at that same instance to cut a throat. I don't have any sequence in mind, pick one, they could all apply. I actually don't like the prosecution felt he had to limit it. IMO it could be as or more powerful if he left it as killed him 3 times.
Bottom line for me ... I want the jury to see she slaughtered him and NOT in self defense.
PRAYING
Night everyone. Sweet dreams!
Except Jodi...I hope she has really awful nightmares!!!!
i KNEW that abuse expert would be bad - i watch her videos and read her articles - she is not an advocate for abused women - she is a man hater!!!!! you can really see it in her videos~! and nurmi's private practice since he left the the PD's office is that he specializes in defending sex offenders!! i can't believe she was the only one who came up w/ this defense and i am SURE that nurmi is suborning perjury and i just hope to god some one can prove this and get his ass thrown out of the bar!! and this women has no business be able to be called as an "expert"![]()
Isn't it amazing that Travis is painted as a sleazy pervert, and yet he has no porn on his computer or even magazines in his home? Not one speck of porn? And we know that they can retrieve things like that from the hard drive, unless it was written over.
He didn't even have Jodi's pics around? Those pics she said he talked her into taking?
Who did have porn on their computer? Oh yeah, that's right, Jodi and her dick-pics. Not only did Travis "force" his dick pics on her, but he obviously forced her to keep them on her computer. It's certainly not like Jodi -- who was oh-so-offended -- could delete those pictures.
Frankly, I won't believe that he even sent them to her, unless they show some proof (never happen). For all we know, Jodi took those pictures herself and then mailed them herself. She was obviously fond of taking naked photos of Travis.
There are currently 78 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 78 guests)