Willmott smirks and smiles just like Jodi's family, rolls her eyes and makes faces like a child, extremely unprofessional.
Willmott smirks and smiles just like Jodi's family, rolls her eyes and makes faces like a child, extremely unprofessional.
Judge looks annoyed.
She probably will allow this all and say something like she will let the defense have their crack, then dismiss for the weekend and give Martinez until Monday to do his research.
"Well, it's YOUR fog..." - J. Martinez
Wilmott is all fired up...
My late wife's grandmother, Anna Kaisa Debner Snikkari, (now that's a Finnish name if you've ever heard one), would tell Nurmi to "go sniff a cat's ass." (Translation from the original Finnish Language.) It was the favorite expression of this great, elegant, tough-as-nails Scandinavian matriarch that she uttered in response to almost everybody that annoyed her. Mr. Nurmi would not survive Mrs. Snikkari's withering condemnation.
Last edited by Ian 1; 03-14-2013 at 10:13 AM.
"Of all the emotions, the most dangerous emotion is love." P.D James
"Do you not realize, my son, with how little wisdom this world is run?" Baron von Oxenstiema"
Nooooooooooopo A Morning of nothing
Damn that was quick
Hmmm, nope. He gets 2 hours to talk with the "expert" and maybe review the articles? And how does the judge expect Martinez to raise something earlier that he just found out about today?
"Well, it's YOUR fog..." - J. Martinez
3/14/13
Morning session. Jodi is wearing a nice dark blue shirt today. She has about 10 bangs today.
JM has objections about the witness and article the defense wants to bring in, Dr. Richard Samuels. (OMG, if the things JM is saying the doctor wants to bring up-he going to be on FOREVER) The defense wants to say Jodi had PTSD at the time of the killing.
Wilmont is giving a good argument on why the evidence should be allowed in. Jodi was diagnosed with PTSD by the doctor.
Court is in recess until 1:15 so the state can talk to the doctor.
Personally, since the issue is the presentation, the judge should not permit the presentation and allow the psychologist to simply testify without it. That would erase all issue with regards to this unreleased information. The defense would through a temper tantrum if Juan did this and it could very well be classified as prosecutorial misconduct - so why isn't it a major problem when the defense does it. Wow, double standards.
"Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are" --- Benjamin Franklin
Wilmont is much less annoying in her presentation style than Nurmi
JM will only fight the evidence, not for misconduct. JM doesn't WANT a mistrial like the defense does. He wants it done and over, so of course he won't push the issue.
The Judge should have just EXCLUDED anything related to expressive/bqhatevwr. What a sh*t show
"You are entitled to your own opinions, but you are not entitled to your own facts." D. Moynihan
See my profile page for the location of my "Dear Diary" posts in the Jodi thread. http://mydeathspace.com/vb/member.php?82091-Justice11
Ian-
Correction: Finnish people are not Scandanavians.
And we all know how reliable and unbiased the media is!! Really, letting in media articles. Scientific Journals - sure. But how pathetic is it that a scholar and professional would want to let in a magazine article!!
Heck even in college my professors required scientific journals and would have never, ever allowed a magazine article as part of our research.
Is the guy going to reference Wickipedia next?!?!?!
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)