Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 7 8 9
Results 201 to 222 of 222

Thread: Suspected participants in the Capitol Insurrection Terrorism-January 6, 2021

  1. #201
    Senior Member puke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Wheaton, IL
    Posts
    3,547
    Rep Power
    21474855
    Robert Palmer, 54, of Largo, Florida, wept as he told U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan that he recently watched a video of his actions that day and could not believe what he was seeing.

    This one of those guys that probably has a blue lives matter bumper sticker and then ends up hurting them.
    Gooble goble gooble goble one of us one of us.

  2. #202
    What do you care? Boston Babe 73's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Under your bed
    Posts
    21,633
    Rep Power
    21474867
    Quote Originally Posted by puke View Post
    Robert Palmer, 54, of Largo, Florida, wept as he told U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan that he recently watched a video of his actions that day and could not believe what he was seeing.

    This one of those guys that probably has a blue lives matter bumper sticker and then ends up hurting them.
    When the brainwashing breaks it's spell.
    Quote Originally Posted by Miller22 View Post
    I thought the exact same thing. Poor Brennen Tammons.
    Oh well, back to gum.
    ....or exchanging Puke's wang for spicy nuts.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nic B View Post
    That is too pretty to be shoved up an ass.

  3. #203
    Moderator raisedbywolves's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    10,198
    Rep Power
    21474856
    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...jan-6-n1287434

    Oath Keeper leader, 10 others charged with 'seditious conspiracy' in Jan. 6 Capitol attack
    Last edited by raisedbywolves; 11-11-2022 at 07:14 PM.

  4. #204
    Senior Member Bewitchingstorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Never have I been a blue, calm sea...I have always been a storm.
    Posts
    8,501
    Rep Power
    21474852
    Quote Originally Posted by raisedbywolves View Post
    Rhodes had put out a call on the group's website in the days before the attack for "all patriots who can be in DC" to travel to Washington for a "security mission" to "stand tall in support of President Trump's fight."
    Geez.

  5. #205
    Senior Member curiouscat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,293
    Rep Power
    21474847
    On my cell.
    I wished he'd die already so we'd have one less idiot in America.
    Trump calls for 'biggest protest we have ever had' if prosecutors 'do anything illegal' in targeting him
    https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...prosecutors-do
    Quote Originally Posted by Boston Babe 73 View Post
    I don't have a thousand dollars hanging around to buy a fart in a jar lol.

  6. #206
    What do you care? Boston Babe 73's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Under your bed
    Posts
    21,633
    Rep Power
    21474867
    Quote Originally Posted by curiouscat View Post
    On my cell.
    I wished he'd die already so we'd have one less idiot in America.
    Trump calls for 'biggest protest we have ever had' if prosecutors 'do anything illegal' in targeting him
    https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...prosecutors-do
    He's inciting violence again. He NEEDS TO BE DETAINED.
    Quote Originally Posted by Miller22 View Post
    I thought the exact same thing. Poor Brennen Tammons.
    Oh well, back to gum.
    ....or exchanging Puke's wang for spicy nuts.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nic B View Post
    That is too pretty to be shoved up an ass.

  7. #207
    Senior Member curiouscat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,293
    Rep Power
    21474847
    Quote Originally Posted by Boston Babe 73 View Post
    He's inciting violence again. He NEEDS TO BE DETAINED.
    If he was black, he'd be dead.
    Quote Originally Posted by Boston Babe 73 View Post
    I don't have a thousand dollars hanging around to buy a fart in a jar lol.

  8. #208
    What do you care? Boston Babe 73's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Under your bed
    Posts
    21,633
    Rep Power
    21474867
    Quote Originally Posted by curiouscat View Post
    If he was black, he'd be dead.
    Truth.
    Quote Originally Posted by Miller22 View Post
    I thought the exact same thing. Poor Brennen Tammons.
    Oh well, back to gum.
    ....or exchanging Puke's wang for spicy nuts.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nic B View Post
    That is too pretty to be shoved up an ass.

  9. #209
    Senior Member curiouscat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,293
    Rep Power
    21474847
    On my cell.
    Oh God! It's about to get really bad in America.
    I guess if I want to wrap myself in the American flag and torch a government building then I'm within my rights.
    These stupid Republicans are trying to start a dangerous precedent.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/04/u...3MRQFl1gyTs%3D
    Quote Originally Posted by Boston Babe 73 View Post
    I don't have a thousand dollars hanging around to buy a fart in a jar lol.

  10. #210
    What do you care? Boston Babe 73's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Under your bed
    Posts
    21,633
    Rep Power
    21474867
    Quote Originally Posted by curiouscat View Post
    On my cell.
    Oh God! It's about to get really bad in America.
    I guess if I want to wrap myself in the American flag and torch a government building then I'm within my rights.
    These stupid Republicans are trying to start a dangerous precedent.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/04/u...3MRQFl1gyTs%3D
    Basically, they're going to shun anyone that wants to investigate them. They don't like the checks and balances because they are not for an actual democracy. They want to dictate.
    Quote Originally Posted by Miller22 View Post
    I thought the exact same thing. Poor Brennen Tammons.
    Oh well, back to gum.
    ....or exchanging Puke's wang for spicy nuts.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nic B View Post
    That is too pretty to be shoved up an ass.

  11. #211
    Moderator raisedbywolves's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    10,198
    Rep Power
    21474856
    Quote Originally Posted by curiouscat View Post
    On my cell.
    Oh God! It's about to get really bad in America.
    I guess if I want to wrap myself in the American flag and torch a government building then I'm within my rights.
    These stupid Republicans are trying to start a dangerous precedent.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/04/u...3MRQFl1gyTs%3D
    It's telling me I need a subscription to view. Boo. But I can guess the gist of it.

  12. #212
    Senior Member curiouscat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,293
    Rep Power
    21474847
    I hope this isn't confusing. I tried copying and it kept showing that you must subscribe ad. I think I might've gotten around it. I'll have to post in two parts.

    G.O.P. Declares Jan. 6 Attack ?Legitimate Political Discourse?
    The Republican National Committee voted to censure Representatives Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger for participating in the inquiry into the deadly riot at the Capitol.

    WASHINGTON ? The Republican Party on Friday officially declared the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol and events that led to it ?legitimate political discourse,? and rebuked two lawmakers in the party who have been most outspoken in condemning the deadly riot and the role of Donald J. Trump in spreading the election lies that fueled it.

    The Republican National Committee?s voice vote to censure Representatives Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger of Illinois at its winter meeting in Salt Lake City culminated more than a year of vacillation, which started with party leaders condemning the Capitol attack and Mr. Trump?s conduct, then shifted to downplaying and denying it.

    On Friday, the party went further in a resolution slamming Ms. Cheney and Mr. Kinzinger for taking part in the House investigation of the assault, saying they were participating in ?persecution of ordinary citizens engaged in legitimate political discourse.?

    After the vote, party leaders rushed to clarify that language, saying it was never meant to apply to rioters who violently stormed the Capitol in Mr. Trump?s name.

    ?Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger crossed a line,? Ronna McDaniel, the Republican National Committee chairwoman, said in a statement. ?They chose to join Nancy Pelosi in a Democrat-led persecution of ordinary citizens who engaged in legitimate political discourse that had nothing to do with violence at the Capitol.?

    But the censure, which was carefully negotiated in private among party members, made no such distinction, nor is the House committee investigating the attack examining any normal political debate. It was the latest and most forceful effort by the Republican Party to minimize what happened and the broader attempt by Mr. Trump and his allies to invalidate the results of the 2020 election. In approving it and opting to punish two of its own, Republicans seemed to embrace a position that many of them have only hinted at: that the assault and the actions that preceded it were acceptable.

    It came days after Mr. Trump suggested that, if re-elected in 2024, he would consider pardons for those convicted in the Jan. 6 attack and for the first time described his goal that day as subverting the election results, saying in a statement that Vice President Mike Pence ?could have overturned the election.?

    On Friday, Mr. Pence pushed back on Mr. Trump, calling his assertion ?wrong.?

    ?I had no right to overturn the election,? Mr. Pence told the Federalist Society, a conservative legal organization, at a gathering in Florida.

    The day?s events, which were supposed to be about unity, only served to highlight Republicans? persistent division over Mr. Trump?s attempt to overturn the 2020 election, as their leaders try to move forward and focus attention on what they call the failings of the Biden administration. More than a year later, the party is still wrestling with how much criticism and dissent it will tolerate.

    ?Shame falls on a party that would censure persons of conscience, who seek truth in the face of vitriol,? Senator Mitt Romney, Republican of Utah, wrote on Twitter ?Honor attaches to Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger for seeking truth even when doing so comes at great personal cost.?

    He did not mention that the party chairwoman who presided over the meeting and orchestrated the censure resolution, Ms. McDaniel, is his niece.

    The censure was also condemned by Senator Bill Cassidy, Republican of Louisiana, who, like Mr. Romney, voted to remove Mr. Trump from office for inciting insurrection on Jan. 6, and Gov. Larry Hogan of Maryland, also a Republican, who called Friday ?a sad day for my party ? and the country.?

    Republican National Committee members defended the measure, describing people who have been questioned by the Jan. 6 committee as victims in a broader Democratic effort to keep focus on the attack at the Capitol.

    ?The nominal Republicans on the committee provide a pastiche of bipartisanship, but no genuine protection or due process for the ordinary people who did not riot being targeted and terrorized by the committee,? said Richard Porter, a Republican National Committee member from Illinois. ?The investigation is a de facto Democrat-only investigation increasingly unmoored from congressional norms.?

    The Jan. 6 committee, which has seven Democratic members, has interviewed more than 475 witnesses, the vast majority of whom either volunteered to testify or agreed to without a subpoena. It has no prosecutorial powers, and is charged with drawing up a report and producing recommendations to prevent anything similar from happening again.

    The party?s far-right flank has long agitated to boot Ms. Cheney and Mr. Kinzinger out of the House Republican Conference for agreeing to serve on the panel, a push that Representative Kevin McCarthy of California, the minority leader, has tried to brush aside. And the formal censure, approved by the state party chairs and committee members who make up the Republican National Committee, is sure to stir up those efforts again.

    The Republican Party declared the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol and events that led to it as ?legitimate political discourse.?
    The Republican Party declared the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol and events that led to it as ?legitimate political discourse.?Credit...Jason Andrew for The New York Times
    ?We need to move on from that whole discussion and, frankly, move forward and get the House back in 2022,? said Representative Mike Garcia, a California Republican facing a difficult re-election campaign in a newly configured district.

    Most House Republicans tried to ignore the actions of the party on Friday, refusing to answer questions or saying they had not read the censure resolution. Representative Dan Crenshaw, Republican of Texas, called it ?dumb stuff,? while Representative Mark Green, Republican of Tennessee, lamented the distraction from ?this abysmal administration?s record.?

    Democrats, however, were incensed at the resolution?s language.

    ?The Republican Party is so off the deep end now that they are describing an attempted coup and a deadly insurrection as political expression,? said Representative Jamie Raskin, Democrat of Maryland and a member of the special House committee investigating the Capitol attack. ?It is a scandal that historians will be aghast at, to think that a major political party would be denouncing Liz Cheney for standing up for the Constitution and not saying anything about Donald Trump?s involvement in the insurrection.?

    In his own defense, Mr. Kinzinger said: ?I have no regrets about my decision to uphold my oath of office and defend the Constitution. I will continue to focus my efforts on standing for truth and working to fight the political matrix that?s led us to where we find ourselves today.?

    The resolution spoke repeatedly of party unity as the goal of censuring the lawmakers, saying that Republicans? ability to focus on the Biden administration was being ?sabotaged? by the ?actions and words? of Ms. Cheney and Mr. Kinzinger, which indicate ?they support Democrat efforts to destroy President Trump more than they support winning back a Republican majority in 2022.?

    Normally, the party stays out of primary fights, but the resolution will make it easier for the Republican apparatus to abandon Ms. Cheney and throw its weight and money behind her main G.O.P. challenger, Harriet Hageman.

    It declares that the party ?shall immediately cease any and all support of? both lawmakers ?as members of the Republican Party for their behavior, which has been destructive to the institution of the U.S. House of Representatives, the Republican Party and our republic, and is inconsistent with the position of the conference.?

    Mr. Kinzinger has already announced he will not seek re-election, as have some other House Republicans who voted to impeach Mr. Trump for inciting the attack on the Capitol. Ms. Cheney, however, has vowed to stand for re-election.
    Quote Originally Posted by Boston Babe 73 View Post
    I don't have a thousand dollars hanging around to buy a fart in a jar lol.

  13. #213
    Senior Member curiouscat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,293
    Rep Power
    21474847
    The posting of this article kept giving me trouble.
    Representative Adam Kinzinger has announced that he will not seek re-election, as have some other House Republicans who voted to impeach Mr. Trump.
    Representative Adam Kinzinger has announced that he will not seek re-election, as have some other House Republicans who voted to impeach Mr. Trump.Credit...Stefani Reynolds for The New York Times
    Earlier this week, the Wyoming delegation to the Republican National Committee submitted a so-called “Rule 11” letter, formalizing party support for Ms. Hageman. The existence of the letter was reported by The Washington Post.

    The letter allows the Republican National Committee to send resources to the Wyoming branch of the party to spend on Ms. Hageman’s behalf — essentially designating her as the party’s presumptive nominee. The designations are common in Republican politics, but typically are used to support incumbents who may be facing token primary challengers.

    Ms. Cheney, who faces an uphill battle in her re-election bid against a Republican Party aligned with Mr. Trump, said party leaders “have made themselves willing hostages” to Mr. Trump.

    “I do not recognize those in my party who have abandoned the Constitution to embrace Donald Trump,” she said. “History will be their judge. I will never stop fighting for our constitutional republic. No matter what.”

    Ms. Cheney has a commanding financial advantage over Ms. Hageman, according to federal campaign finance reports released this week. Ms. Cheney entered 2022 with nearly $5 million in campaign cash, while Ms. Hageman reported just $380,000.

    The censure resolution was watered down from an initial version that called directly for the House Republican Conference to “expel” Ms. Cheney and Mr. Kinzinger “without delay.” That demand was dropped. However, the language condemning the attack on “legitimate political discourse” was then added.

    William J. Palatucci, a Republican National Committee member from New Jersey who said he opposed the resolution, said those changes were made “behind closed doors.” The final language was officially circulated to committee members early Friday morning. He called it “cancel culture at its worst.
    Quote Originally Posted by Boston Babe 73 View Post
    I don't have a thousand dollars hanging around to buy a fart in a jar lol.

  14. #214
    Moderator raisedbywolves's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    10,198
    Rep Power
    21474856
    I can't rep you, so thank you CC!

  15. #215
    Moderator raisedbywolves's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    10,198
    Rep Power
    21474856
    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/oath...ry?id=83212947

    Oath Keeper is 1st to plead guilty to seditious conspiracy for Jan. 6 attack
    Last edited by raisedbywolves; 11-11-2022 at 07:01 PM.

  16. #216
    Senior Member curiouscat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,293
    Rep Power
    21474847
    Quote Originally Posted by raisedbywolves View Post
    I can't rep you, so thank you CC!
    You're welcome!
    Quote Originally Posted by Boston Babe 73 View Post
    I don't have a thousand dollars hanging around to buy a fart in a jar lol.

  17. #217
    Moderator puzzld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    21,450
    Rep Power
    21474873
    https://lawandcrime.com/u-s-capitol-...ce=mostpopular

    Am I the only one who thinks maybe she should lose custody of her kid?
    Quote Originally Posted by bowieluva View Post
    lol at Nestle being some vicious smiter, she's the nicest person on this site besides probably puzzld. Or at least the last person to resort to smiting.
    Quote Originally Posted by nestlequikie View Post
    Why on earth would I smite you when I can ban you?

  18. #218
    What do you care? Boston Babe 73's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Under your bed
    Posts
    21,633
    Rep Power
    21474867
    Quote Originally Posted by puzzld View Post
    https://lawandcrime.com/u-s-capitol-...ce=mostpopular

    Am I the only one who thinks maybe she should lose custody of her kid?
    She should lose her kid and she should serve her sentence all at once. She cheered on people being beaten and filmed it. She's a piece of shit.
    Quote Originally Posted by Miller22 View Post
    I thought the exact same thing. Poor Brennen Tammons.
    Oh well, back to gum.
    ....or exchanging Puke's wang for spicy nuts.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nic B View Post
    That is too pretty to be shoved up an ass.

  19. #219
    Scoopski Potatoes Nic B's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Sacramento, California
    Posts
    11,374
    Rep Power
    21474859
    I had every constitutional right to carry a weapon and take over Congress as we tried to do
    It's scary people actually believe this.


    Quote Originally Posted by marakisses View Post
    yes i said i will leave it under you storage he said cuddle with me i said shut up it over??? what am i doing wrong??
    Quote Originally Posted by curiouscat View Post
    Happy Birthday! I hid a dead body in your backyard to celebrate. Good luck finding it under the cement. You can only use a stick to look for it.

  20. #220
    Moderator raisedbywolves's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    10,198
    Rep Power
    21474856
    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/jus...ence-rcna45338

    Ex-NYPD cop who assaulted D.C. officer on Jan. 6 gets record-setting 10-year sentence

    A retired New York City Police Department officer who was convicted of several felonies for attacking a D.C. cop with a flag pole on Jan. 6 and then tackling the officer to the ground and attempting to rip off his gas mask was sentenced to 10 years in federal prison on Thursday.

    Thomas Webster was sentenced by Judge Amit P. Mehta to the longest sentence yet in a Jan. 6 case.

    Webster, 56, was convicted by a jury in May after they determined he was lying on the stand when he tried to convince them he was trying to help the officer he assaulted to "see my hands" when he grabbed the officer's gas mask after he tackled him to the ground.

    No one should be “gleeful” that Webster was facing 17.5 years in federal prison, Mehta said Thursday.

    "What you did that day, it is hard to really put into words," Mehta told Webster. "I still remain shocked every single time I see [video of the attack]."

    Mehta said Webster was "the first aggressor" in his confrontation with the D.C. police officer, and "all hell broke loose" on the police line when Webster showed up at that part of the police line.

    "Nothing can explain or justify Mr. Webster's rage," Assistant U.S. Attorney Hava Arin Levenson Mirell told the judge. "Webster is one of the rioters who should have known better."

    “No one knows better than a former cop how dangerous it was on Jan. 6,” the federal prosecutor said, saying that Webster's service made his behavior “particularly heinous.”

    Even if he didn’t know better than “to believe Trump’s lie,” he knew better than to assault officers, Mirell said.

    “He feels entitled to do what he wants as a former police officer,” Mirell said. Webster went "old-school" and "rogue" on Jan. 6, she said, adding that “instigated violence” and was clearly anticipating a violent clash.

  21. #221
    Moderator raisedbywolves's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    10,198
    Rep Power
    21474856
    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/jus...rial-rcna58415

    Two Oath Keepers, including founder, convicted of seditious conspiracy in Jan. 6 case

  22. #222
    What do you care? Boston Babe 73's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Under your bed
    Posts
    21,633
    Rep Power
    21474867
    Quote Originally Posted by raisedbywolves View Post
    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/jus...rial-rcna58415

    Two Oath Keepers, including founder, convicted of seditious conspiracy in Jan. 6 case
    YESSSSSSS
    Quote Originally Posted by Miller22 View Post
    I thought the exact same thing. Poor Brennen Tammons.
    Oh well, back to gum.
    ....or exchanging Puke's wang for spicy nuts.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nic B View Post
    That is too pretty to be shoved up an ass.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •