Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Logan Michael Osborn, 19 sexually assaulted 14-year-old girl will serve no jail time

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    3,753
    Rep Power
    0

    Logan Michael Osborn, 19 sexually assaulted 14-year-old girl will serve no jail time

    https://fox5sandiego.com/2018/08/10/...-no-jail-time/

    You can See why nobody trust the Justice system.

    CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, Va. ? A former Virginia high school student who sexually assaulted a 14-year-old girl will serve no active prison time, a judge ruled Wednesday.

    Logan Michael Osborn, 19, pleaded guilty in September to the charge of having carnal knowledge of the girl. At the time, he was sentenced to 10 years in prison, with eight years suspended.

    In early January, Chesterfield Circuit Court Judge T.J. Hauler decided to pause the two-year term, saying that he wanted more time to review the case. On Wednesday, he declined to reinstate the original sentence.

    ?The family is disappointed that the defendant will not serve any active incarceration for the brutal attack on the victim,? Chesterfield prosecutor Erin Barr told the Richmond Times-Dispatch. ?They do not believe justice has been served and shared concern for community safety and future potential victims.?

  2. #2
    Senior Member blighted star's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Probably South Of You
    Posts
    11,256
    Rep Power
    21474859
    Yeah, that's fucked up. They're describing a brutal attack but the court"s treating it like it was carnal knowledge charge for a "consensual" relationship between teenagers?

    The defendant must be a white boy from a "good family"

  3. #3
    Senior Member blighted star's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Probably South Of You
    Posts
    11,256
    Rep Power
    21474859
    Yup. Another Brock Turner. Poor boy lost a chemistry scholarship. Boo hoo. & this judge pretty much asked the defence to give him an excuse not to apply a custodial sentence





    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-a8487651.html

    Man who tied up and sexually assaulted 14-year-old girl will not go to jail after US court hears incident was 'consensual'
    Virginia judge Timothy J Hauler stayed prison sentence after asking to 'hear some positive things' from defence


    Defence lawyer used fact girl had watched 'Fifty Shades of Grey' to argue sex was consensual ( Getty )


    A man who tied up a 14-year-old girl before sexually assaulting her will serve no jail time after defence lawyers told a US court the incident was consensual.

    Logan Michael Osborn, 19, pleaded guilty and was originally sentenced to 10 years in prison with eight years suspended by a judge in Chesterfield County, Virginia.


    But circuit judge Timothy J Hauler delayed the enforcement of the remaining two-year term in January, then stayed the prison sentence entirely this week.


    Anger over girl jailed for abortion after being raped by brother
    During a hearing on Wednesday, the Richmond Times-Dispatch reported that he told a defence lawyer: ?I need to hear some positive things.?


    A foreman at an electrical company where Osborn works was called to give evidence and described him as a ?model employee?.

    ?The sky?s the limit,? he said of Osborn?s future with the firm.

    Osborn will have to register as a sex offender and lost an academic scholarship to study chemistry at the University of Mary Washington because of the conviction.

    Osborn pleaded guilty to having ?carnal knowledge? of his victim in September, which is a crime in Virginia involving children between the ages of 13 and 15, in agreement that prosecutors would not pursue the more serious charge of ?forcible sodomy?.

    Prosecutors said he and the girl had attended a school play together in April 2017 before he let the victim to a dead end in the school grounds, the Richmond Times-Dispatch reported.

    Osborn is alleged to have forcibly pushed the girl to her knees and tied a belt around her neck and hands before forcing her to perform a sex act.


    The victim was crying during the assault, and at one point Osborn picked her up and pushed her against the fence, and then back on her knees, the court was told.

    She was untied before being picked up by her mother, who questioned her over what happened because of her distress and took her to hospital for forensic examination.


    Defence lawyers claimed that the incident was consensual because the pair had discussed Fifty Shades of Grey beforehand planned to ?have some fun? after the play, but prosecutors said the girl was taken advantage of, was too young to legally consent to sexual acts and that the suggestion was offensive.



    A clinical psychologist classed Osborn as at ?moderately high risk? for reoffending and the court heard that he had been accused of inappropriate sexual conduct with girls several times, being charged with grabbing a child?s genitals at the age of 12.

    Judge Hauler has previously been criticised for several decisions relating to sex offenders. In 2016 he rejected Virginia state authorities? request not to release a man jailed for raping his ex-girlfriend and suspected in many other sex attacks.

    The man, Dana William, later murdered his ex-wife?s father and killed himself before police could catch him.

    In 2009, a former Virginia senator warned Judge Hauler had a record of having decisions overturned.

    ?I had serious concerns and did some research and felt like it was best that he not continue on the bench,? Steven Martin told WTVR.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    3,753
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by blighted star View Post
    Yeah, that's fucked up. They're describing a brutal attack but the court"s treating it like it was carnal knowledge charge for a "consensual" relationship between teenagers?

    The defendant must be a white boy from a "good family"
    Like I said in some other threads I wished vigilantes going after privileged white men like this and giving these people like Osborne and turner in the rants and wished some Dexter type person destroyed these people.


  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    3,753
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by blighted star View Post
    Yup. Another Brock Turner. Poor boy lost a chemistry scholarship. Boo hoo. & this judge pretty much asked the defence to give him an excuse not to apply a custodial sentence





    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-a8487651.html
    OK we should take out the organs of Osborn by force of these people to teach them a lesson if you do this then the vigilante system will be after you.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    3,753
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by KambingSociety View Post
    OK we should take out the organs of Osborn by force of these people to teach them a lesson if you do this then the vigilante system will be after you.
    Sarcasm gone insane. But I can see vigilantes targeting him at some point given the way things are going.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    77
    Rep Power
    4165037
    When a judge rules like that against sexual crimes, I can’t help but think he himself is really into fucking kids and/or rape.

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    20
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Jammers View Post
    When a judge rules like that against sexual crimes, I can’t help but think he himself is really into fucking kids and/or rape.
    This.

  9. #9
    Senior Member DiaDeLosMuertos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    780
    Rep Power
    8267404
    Sick. I am so sick of guys like this getting away with this kind of behavior.
    Jenn

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •