Ohhh HI GABLE
And you are doing what? Certainly not making any real contribution, rather you simply spew vitrol, and allegations interspersed with the occasional reference to mittens...
Is that supposed to be some kind of insult? Kinda weak.... really....
If you are really from somewhere across the world... how sad do you have to be to get so invested in this.
False claims. I have provided the most likely explanation and instead of choosing to discuss it intelligently, the collective stupidity of MDS has dragged the discussion through the mud. Should I be surprised? Of course not, what is the point of trying to provoke rational, intelligent discussion with a group of mindless harpees?
At the very least, one of you could provide any sort of explanation as to why you think Julie lied about being molested by her creeper brother.
Okay, a somewhat reasonable response....
Bear with me, I read all your posts, but see no offer of the proof of molestation in any of them.
Perhaps it was posted under a different name?
The thread is long, and I am old and tired... can you link me to where Julie says this?
Was it a 3rd party revelation... or did Julie actually pout this in writing somewhere?
If in fact it is 3rd party info.... it's moot. No court would ever even breach the subject...
He can't face his accuser, and with no actual eye witnesses it would raise a reasonable doubt.
I would however think if this was a known FACT, then he would have been looked at as a suspect.
If he has ironclad alibis.... no need to polygraph, and they don't mean shit anyway....
I'm a pretty honest guy, and I would never take one, as it can not help you, and a passed polygraph is not any more an admissible piece of evidence than is a failed one.
There is no benefit taking one.
You are making it seem as if there was a conspiracy by Law enforcement to purposely not catch whoever it is who did this.
I find it hard to believe, I just do.
Hey Bill or Bill's friend (probably Bill) I can't quote your post, but if you think we are going to take your word for it that Julie was molested by her brother, you are sorely mistaken. Insulting our intelligence by making false claims to deter suspicion away from Bill, then actually calling us dumb is not going to help your case.
Honestly Bill, I thought you couldn't stoop any lower. I was wrong. You are a disgusting person for making those accusations. No one believes you.
If Julie had really told Bill that stuff about her brother, Bill would've been shouting it from the rooftops from the beginning. He only said it in retaliation because Julie's brother said she told her family Bill was abusive. Bill has never mentioned it since. He will do anything to deflect blame, and if there was any validity to it, he would have said it a million times by now ... kinda like the ring, the flowers, and the ring and the flowers. He lied because he's a vindictive little turd.
If Bill had even a shred of decency he would comment here and set the record straight. But he doesn't, so he won't.
... And I don't own any mittens
Hey, Genius. She couldn't quote because of a glitch on the site right now. And claiming something Bill said in passing as fact is irresponsible at best. It's called heresay and it's not admissible in a court of law for a reason.
The reason people respond to you in a harsh manner is because you deliver in an uber douchey, holier than thou way. You get what you give.
Did you lose your mittens?
Other than Bill saying Julie told him this, where is real proof that Julie did in fact tell that to Bill? If all you or Bill have is Bill's word, than you don't have shit. Julie is not here to confirm any of this. It's more likely Bill made it up to deflect blame away from himself and onto her brother. There isn't anyone on this planet who believes a word Bill says.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)