The official conclusion that it was an accident? I would say your opinion differs.
You WANT this to be an accident, and for that reason YOU have a limited point of view.
Biology and physics have not been tested.
If you really wanted to put those laws to the test, I suppose you could stuff your self in
a gym mat and see how well you fair...this is me thinking you won't because you wouldn't fall in or out.
The bold doesn't make your point any more valid than anyone else posting in this thread.
I remember NY Ron from earlier in the thread. It wasn't easy at times to read, but I covered most of it. Morbid was wrong.
His face was swollen less than 24 hours after death and that assumes he died right after he was last seen on video. Don't forget that no credible evidence has been provided of any accident. Video is needed to prove the accident theory. In other words, his face looked nearly same on the 14th (the day of the autopsy) as it did on the 11th except for some skin slippage. I was able to view some better quality images and I will tell you that it's pretty damn nasty. It gave me a sinking feeling.
The paragraph starts with: On January 11, 2013 at 10:32 am.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/181050020...ent-Report-pdf
"The facial area was severely disfigured and swollen."
Crazy Death. Yeah I am been reading and reviewing this case a few years ago. I sorta remember the police and school officials were slow to release the video tape. To me it was kinda suspicious to hold the tape, like somebody was covering up a murder.
Well I guess I will revisit this case and give another opinion later on.
Painting a Rainbow on your Heart with Sunshine Love
It was aliens!
http://valdosta.sgaonline.com/2010vd...ck-johnson.pdf
WHY DID YOU GIVE UP ON KJ?
Why did Gaffney-Kraft not document these two distinct wounds on Johnson's right arm? I think I know why, and so do you. I'm asking you to reconsider your position and join me. KJ needs hundreds of people with knowledge to speak out about this cover-up.
It's the equivalent of "rug burn", dude. They look like rub marks from the mat. What kind of weapon do you know rubs the skin off? A knife? Nope. Did his attacker rub him to death?
I don't understand your obsession with making this in to something it isn't. I'm all for side eyeing suspicious shit. I do it ALL of the time. This simply isn't one of those cases.
You totally blew off that she ignored clear wounds. That's exactly what a cover-up is. In essence you are doing what she might do. Like that bitch Clinton. "What difference does it make?"
They are facts along with tons of others that point to foul play in this case.
I assumed he got those abrasions (if you can call them that) when he was struggling to free himself from the mat. Those aren't defensive wounds, and if he was already deceased before he was put in the mat he wouldn't have them.
He didn't knock the mat over because there were other mats surrounding that one, so it was impossible to push it over.
Let me guess...you are voting for Trump? Politics are irrelevant to this case, but I saw you insulted Hiliary, so I assumed. Feel free to correct me.
Just because she failed to mention it does make it a cover-up or she'd have mentioned it. The fact remains, there's plenty of evidence that KJ was forcibly deprived of oxygen, which ultimately led to this death.
In order to have an "accident", you first need some evidence like the video.
The only thing it proves is that she didn't do a great job. If that's what you're trying to prove, great. You did. It still doesn't prove some kind of conspiracy because the fact remains that those wounds are not consistent with a homicide. You can't make rub burns in to defensive wounds based on the Coroner leaving them out of the report.
It's like me saying someone was Murdered because the Coroner failed to point out a mole on someone's back.
The most logical explanation would be she made a mistake. She's a human.
A second autopsy, with fresh eyes, indicated that she did make a mistake. But the second autopsy still said it was an accident.
He was forcibly denied of oxygen when he died as a result of positional asphyxia.
If someone killed them (which they didn't) why would they put the body in a mat? Wouldn't they want to get rid of evidence?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)