Part of the secret of success in life is to eat what you like and let the food fight it out inside. - Mark Twain
idk - i am thinking that toni might be in trouble w the courts - not anything to do w/ "lana cane" - she is being very quiet, not even responding to questions very much or at length or posting any more blogs - maybe keenans and brooks family finally got her shut down for the minute - is there a way to see if she has been in court???? - and i gotta think that steve has lost a ton of business because of her antics and i don't think she is working - she has prolly sent her family into financial ruin and aren't able to defend against the amount of charged those families have against her (plus there aren't very many ppl sending her positive comments at all any more and i bet she is alienating what friends she has left by naming them in the blog too)
Whats this crazy former prosecutor's name? I'll look her up on the ABA. Impersonating a lawyer is illegal and she'd be in deep shit.
She was a lawyer. I don't know if she still is, but she was once a prosector.
I typed prosecutor wrong. Sorry.
Yeah, she was a lawyer. She worked for the Attorney General's office or something in Maryland. I saw on another site that she did not go by her married name with the bar association. I meant to catch her surname and clicked out of the tab first. When I remembered what I did, I tried to find it again. Some of her links have gone missing. I found a FB for her that plastered all of her crap on it and it is missing now. She's being awfully quiet for her big mouth.
Ya know, I'm not really all that obsessed about this thread. I don't feel the sudden urge to post on Toni's blog. I don't feel the urge to be a crusader for justice either. Nevertheless, I feel as though your comment is stupid. I was going to call it something else... something a little more sophisticated, but I'm sorry. I've dealt with unsavory people all day and just want to call it what I think it is, "stupid". Not you... the comment. So let's not start a dramatic war where one of us gets banned.
Why? Because she said she had thousands of submissions. THOUSANDS of submissions, yet she posts a really obviously posed and pristine picture of candles and says that somebody submitted it. True that she could have been duped and someone might have just sent her a picture of a wallpaper, but it seems like all her pictures just try to be artistic, so she didn't even vet it.
Okay, the second thing - it's not stalking when somebody makes a blog to detail EVERY detail of her own life and WANTS people to read it. Grieving mother or not, that's attention-whoring. So when we read the blog (although we really shouldn't. I haven't read the damn thing in months because I won't give her the satisfaction of hits on the site), it's not stalking... it's called reading.
I've said it to several people who post their shit on Facebook... if you don't want your shit to get read and you're thinking we're stalking you, then don't post all your shit online for the whole world to read.
And when she says stupid crap on Dr. Phil like, "well they don't HAVE to read the blog." No, you don't HAVE to defame these people when you have NO proof that it was them. She doesn't have definitive proof that her daughter was murdered. She doesn't even have definitive proof of the people she's caught in these videos. All she has is her crazy theories and down-to-the-second stalking accounts of everyone in her family and all the neighbors.
I don't feel like we're stalking something she aired out in public.
...and for the record, I also don't think spamming her blog with negative thoughts is going to do anything. This kind of attention whore wants negative attention so she can get people in trouble. Considering the fact that early on people were talking to her about theories and she was immediately accusing them of being there the night that her daughter died. People who were nowhere NEAR Colorado.
hmmmm.... well this is on the court docket - i am not sure what it means:
12/12/2012 01:00:00 PM County Court Status Conference INGRAM STEVE 2012C729 Courtroom 1
12/12/2012 01:00:00 PM County Court Status Conference INGRAM STEVE 2012C802 Courtroom 1
12/12/2012 01:00:00 PM County Court Status Conference INGRAM TONI 2012C730 Courtroom 1
12/12/2012 01:00:00 PM County Court Status Conference INGRAM TONI 2012C801 Courtroom 1
status conference n. a pre-trial meeting of attorneys before a judge required under Federal Rules of Procedure and in many states to inform the court as to how the case is proceeding, what discovery has been conducted (depositions, interrogatories, production of documents), any settlement negotiations, probable length of trial, and other matters relevant to moving the case toward trial. Court rules usually require the filing of a status conference statement prior to the conference.
Is this conference r/t Toni's restraining order violations? What else could it be?
yea - this also listed
12/12/2012 01:00:00 PM County Court Status Conference HARRIS BROOKE 2012C801 Courtroom 1
12/12/2012 01:00:00 PM County Court Status Conference HARRIS BROOKE 2012C802 Courtroom 1
12/12/2012 01:00:00 PM County Court Status Conference HARRIS CHRISTINA 2012C801 Courtroom 1
12/12/2012 01:00:00 PM County Court Status Conference HARRIS CHRISTINA 2012C802 Courtroom 1
12/12/2012 01:00:00 PM County Court Status Conference HARRIS JAMES 2012C729 Courtroom 1
12/12/2012 01:00:00 PM County Court Status Conference HARRIS JAMES 2012C730 Courtroom 1
Well, ignore my previous post lol.
Could be that Brooke's family are suing the Ingrams.
Lurker checking in.
I'm not sure. I'm sure they have incurred emotional and/or psychological damage, but I'm not sure how you sue and prove that. I would sue the shit out of the Ingram's, too. If it affected by career, I would put a freaking lien on anything they ever owned. I hold licenses and could lose them. That ain't cool.
Last edited by nerdmiga; 12-10-2012 at 08:55 PM. Reason: I suck at idioms
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)