Here. Stabby had Nurmi lay out exactly how they would drag TA's name through the mud.
http://jodiariasisinnocent.com/wp-co...nocent-com.pdf
Here. Stabby had Nurmi lay out exactly how they would drag TA's name through the mud.
http://jodiariasisinnocent.com/wp-co...nocent-com.pdf
It's comical really http://wildabouttrial.com/wp-content...ument-2011.pdf
Looks like there is a mattress cover on the bed so you wouldn't see the plastic corners. I do agree that the last pic the wood does not appear to be the same as his bed frame but it doesn't mean it's not. There are no clear pictures of the side of the bed that I could find but it is not the front. It's possible that the last picture was taken in another part of the house. The carpet looks to be the same throughout. I do not know about the claim that there was no other blood in other parts of the house (we know there was blood on the washer/dryer as that's what clued investigators in to look there). Also, there is a chunk of carpet missing from his bedroom closet (I forget where I saw this, perhaps Tawnidilly's photobucket of the house after) but if there was no other blood in the house, why take that chunk of carpet? Not disputing anyone's claims, just thinking out loud.
Yep! (figured while I was getting the above photos I'd grab that one too)
Duct tape was in the laundry room.
"so he ejaculated on your face and threw you some candy?"
Thanks Wonder Dog and Onehundred Cats -
Better picture of the bed with the mattress cover
"so he ejaculated on your face and threw you some candy?"
Were you crying when you were stabbing him? --SuperJuan Martinez
Nobody believes a word out of your mouth. Why do you keep talking? -- ABC Interviewer to JA
Link to most of opening statement video (from the justice for TA FB).
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=qOFzQ...%3DqOFzQHQv7Cw
I just have to say this real quick..WTF are the people on JAII thinking??? It's all a conspiracy and she never did any of it, or just shot him. She is too petite. The mormons have threatened the life of her family. It was definitely her roommates because they didn't follow the smell. The craziest thing is this new video that came out with Jodi acting like a lunatic..she was going through the trash looking for food, because she was hungry. I just have to laugh at all the crazy shit they say over there. I go there for pure idiotic entertainment.
The total moron faction there is far too pervasive. I can't tolerate it. Not because they have a different opinion than mine, but because so many of their ideas and rationalizations are just nonsensical.
(But reading some of the nutty recaps people have posted here is entertaining!) Thanks to those who are willing to brave that lunatic asylum and give us a recap.
Were you crying when you were stabbing him? --SuperJuan Martinez
Nobody believes a word out of your mouth. Why do you keep talking? -- ABC Interviewer to JA
I guess it's possible. They must not think the duct tape is too important because I don't remember anyone questioning her about it, or anything else being said about it. It's marked with one of those crime scene numbers though so you would think it would have some significance.
"so he ejaculated on your face and threw you some candy?"
Were you crying when you were stabbing him? --SuperJuan Martinez
Nobody believes a word out of your mouth. Why do you keep talking? -- ABC Interviewer to JA
Does anybody know where the random lonely knife came from in the new evidence photo's?
????
WOOAAAHHHH! I am laughing reading that comment.....then again it saddens me that there is someone out there who could even fathom that idea. <rolling eyes>
Note: HAPPY ST PATRICK'S DAY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCJJpCjbhHc
JA: "This is a really trivial question and it's gonna reveal how shallow I am, but, before they book me can I clean myself up a little bit?"
Det. Flores: "You're gonna be taken the way you are!"
As a group, I hope at this point we can move past a couple of things. We already know: Jodi is a liar and none of her testimony is reliable. Martinez has an will impeach her further as a witness. We already know she is guilty of murder. She has admitted it on the stand, said she did something terrible and should be punished. Her own defense expert witness has called her the perpetrator of a horrible violent crime. While it's fun to talk about that stuff, there is not a lot of relevance to the verdict and punishment at this point. From their questions, the jury was not impressed by her story.
We need to move on and focus on the elments of premeditation, and if they can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in the court. The gas cans have some importance here, but I don't see them as central to convincing the jury. What solid evidence (beyond circumstantial) have you seen of premeditation that has been presented so far? Is it enough for you to convict with a death penalty sentence?
I will start. This text message jumps out at me, sent from Travis to Jodi and mentioned earlier in the thread. It speaks to the motive behind the murder:
Travis hits Jodi with the truth, and many threats. Threats of exposing her and exposing her lies. To a narcissist like Jodi, obsessed with her image, this must have been a worst case scenario. Worlds are colliding, all of her scams will be made known. Instead of facing that, or not caring (was it really a big deal?), she formed a plan to kill him. As a side point, I can't understand why Travis wouldn't just cut off all contact with her (the car?) if he saw so many red flags and feared for his own safety."you have that information. its 15 minutes it would take to gt the info. But you won't take 15 minutes. Why because it is an Fucking lie. So either text me you that you are ready to tell the truth or give me your imaginary friend with
the worst BS story you have ever told or leave me alone. Its a lie like no other. It is freaking foolish. There is no way out of it, you have screwed up your story so bad you can't mend it. You are caught. When will you realize that. I do not know. You have til tomorrow. to have me this persons information before I tell all of the Hughes' Leslie Udy, the Freemans, your parents and anyone else that matters about all the crazy things you have done.
So either fess up or feel the wrath. No matter how bad the truth is I promise you the punishment will be better than the lie. This is worse than your magical email that a mysterious man you've never seen before wrote for you. You insult me by thinking ill believe such crap. nothing else from you til the truth. I already know your lying so why continue. After tomorrow, its gonna get real bad for you. Time to spit it out."
[QUOTING BRILLIG: I see JA capable of a lot of things but I don't see her going all tactical assault. It was something very simple, very accessible, something with some general thought, but nothing that took too much effort. That is how she got caught. All of this screams premeditation, but IMO very half assed.
Sorry Bri my post screwed up. Disregard last post...the is the one that was supposed to be there...
Quote[ Another possibility is that she had it taped to her arm, in a knife sheath, under a long sleeved shirt or jacket. (This has the advantage of explaining that random piece of duct tape that was found as well).]
I see JA capable of a lot of things but I don't see her going all tactical assault. It was something very simple, very accessible, something with some general thought, but nothing that took too much effort. That is how she got caught. All of this screams premeditation, but IMO very half assed.
[ Quote: blah: One of my favorites was someone wondering if maybe this was a failed suicide by Travis and she just put him out of his misery. CAN'T believe that person was serious!???]
I would love to get my hands on whatever pharmaceuticals they are passing out in the dayroom of the mental ward where the JAII site originates.
I work in ophthalmology.... No such thing as 35/100. Everything is 20/x. It could be 20/100 but no such thing as the 35. If she's nearsighted (myopic)they would be like a -1.00 (eg) and if they're readers (presbyopic) they'd be like a +1.00. If you're farsighted it's a + prescription (hyperopic)as well however its different then needing readers as u age. For instance when a child needs glasses to read... They'd be a + prescription though they aren't wearing them because of aging so they would be hyperopic.
Sorry... Make sense?
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)